To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
you can watch it’s flight here: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/BOE1
It’s flying kind of slow and making all sorts of random turns. Is it being piloted by some old vietnamese woman?
I’m always excited by a new first flight. How old am I? I attended the rollout of the 747 as a child. I still remember how huge the nose looked from underneath.
Better late than never.
Wow, I now have a huge boner for Flight Aware. Thanks, @1!
Holy crap, did that thing really slow to 47 MPH at one point? Doesn’t it ever stall? I’ve gone faster than that on Stone Way.
I’m glad I got to see it take-off in person before the rains started.
Selfish Plugging of some of my photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32102828@N0…
Got any of it off the ground, Simone?
Here’s one right as it comes up: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bngphotos/4…
It totally just buzzed Elliott Bay flanked by two companion planes. Very cool!
“Dreamliner” would also be a good name for a sanitary napkin. I’m only saying, because the same trademark can be used in different industries that aren’t in competition.
In the video it looks like there is some dark object dangling on a cord from the back of the vertical stabilizer. You can see it being buffeted by the air stream as the plane flies away from the camera. Anyone know what that is?
I’ve never liked the idea for this plane. Instead of getting people where they want to go faster, instead you’ll be packed in even more like a sardine, and probably going slower to boot.
I don’t want a flight that offers lots of extra amenities (for an extra sky high expense), I just want to get to my destination as fast as possible and get as far away from the airport as I can.
Rant over.
Meh. Show me a vid of it doing a decent barrel roll and then we’ll talk.
Saw it buzzing elliot bay too, went right over my office, landed at Boeing field at approximately 1:35. No explosions or appendage loss thus far.
@11 Totally agree. That’s why I like little planes. The littler the better.
@10: Placenta? Maybe after landing they’ll roast it with herbs and serve it to company brass.
’bout time.
(I’m T Wilson’s kid. He would have been fit to be tied.)
@12, America doesn’t build jets you’d WANT to barrell roll anymore.
Though that stunt in 1955 with the 707 made customers want that jet.
Now if we could just get America to build high-speed passenger rail like every other first world nation ….
“every other first world nation ….”
Don’t you mean those countries that fit into the state of California and have 10 times the population density?
BBC News said that the 787 took off from Seattle. HA! It was Everett you idiots.
@19: California has almost the same population, size, and thus population density as Spain. Spain has an extremely successful high-speed rail system between Madrid and Barcelona that is on par with the high-speed rail planned for California. It has taken a huge chunk of market share from short-haul flights.
Other areas in the US are even denser. There are a lot of places that are dense enough for high-speed rail–including Vancouver-Seattle-Portland (though we’re well down the list in terms of bang for the buck.)
If they want to keep marketing it as the “Dreamliner,” they’d better make sure none fall into the hands of United Airlines.
Congrats, Boeing (and Seattle). Is it just me or does the 787 seem to have an unusually pronounced, um, is the word dihedral angle, by the standards of modern airliners? I mean that the wings seem to be bent upwards, as if it were a bird at the peak of its flap.
@23, that’s about a billion dollars of engineering you’re looking at, finding that perfect lilt for the wings, which are made of composites for the first time. Muy fuel efficient.
Fun fact: due to composites, the 787 has only 10,000 drilled holes in the entire aircraft, compared to over 1,000,000 for a 747.
@24, I’ll take “lilt”, sure, at least metaphorically. Upturn across a spoken phrase vs. upturn along the length of a wing. I’d rather my wing have a lilt than a full-on brogue, in any case.
Even after the billions worth of design work, it must take a certain amount of guts to be on board the maiden flight of something that complicated.
really, gordon? is this what your life has become? SLOG?
for shame!
How irresponsible can they be, holding the test flight so close to a major city??? What if Stringfellow Hawke stole it, renamed it “Dreamwolf”, hid it at his secret mountain facility, and used it to fight crime???