Pedro Gomez, the former Director of External Affairs under Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell has been accused of rape in the second degree, according to a police incident report obtained by The Stranger. Gomez, who abruptly resigned from his position last week, is now under scrutiny as the King County Prosecutor’s Office Special Assault Unit reviews the allegations.
The allegation stems from an encounter between Gomez and Cheryl Delostrinos on June 18, 2024, when the two met for a planned business meeting over drinks near City Hall. According to a police report, the evening ended at a Lake Union apartment where Delostrinos later woke up, disoriented and intoxicated. She allegedly found herself in bed with Gomez performing a non-consensual sex act on her. News of the police report was first reported in the Northwest Asian Weekly.
In an exclusive interview with The Stranger, Delostrinos recounted the events of June 18 involving Gomez, her conflict as an abolitionist grappling with the criminal justice system, and her urgent call for accountability.
In our interview, Delostrinos described a difficult personal decision-making process to report the alleged assault. In addition to the inherent challenges of coming forward with these allegations, Delostrinos, a prison abolitionist and woman of color, faced profound internal conflict about the criminal legal system, but she told The Stranger that her concerns for community safety and the need to hold Gomez accountable led her to report the alleged incident.
“Part of the reason I went through the entire [criminal justice] system and process was to provide evidence so people can believe me and understand what’s happening. I’m speaking publicly because I want to lean on the community,” she says. “As a leader in our community, I’m asking: How are we holding this person accountable? And how are we keeping our community safe?”
“It takes tremendous courage for any survivor to come forward,” says Elizabeth Hendren, an attorney representing Delostrinos from the Sexual Violence Law Center. “Their personal lives are routinely opened up for examination and criticism, and the process is very painful and taxing. We frequently see survivors attacked and shamed by their own communities and by the courts when they choose to hold the people who have sexually abused them accountable.”
She adds that survivors of color often face systemic disbelief and harsher criticism for perceived imperfect choices around their victimization —an added burden Delostrinos knew all too well when she decided to speak out. And because of that, she says, her reason to come forward was very clear.
“I’m not here to take him down. That’s not the goal. I am speaking out and talking about what happened to me, to [make visible] the violence against women, and that it could happen to anybody,” says Delostrinos.
Strictly Business
A burning van first brought Delostrinos and Gomez into each other’s orbits back in December 2023 according to the police report.
At the time, Gomez’s role placed him at the intersection of community engagement and city governance. Acting as a public liaison, he represented the Mayor’s office, and was required to coordinate with the City’s Budget Office, City Council, and central staff. In this public facing role, Gomez would regularly meet with community members to address concerns. It’s how Gomez and Delostrinos originally connected with each other.
Delostrinos has spent her life devoted to building community power, as an organizer, dancer, co-founder of Au Collective, a dance collective devoted to eradicating systemic racism by creating a safe space for femmes, queer, and trans people of color to present their own stories and make art accessible to the communities they come from. It was this passion for community that inspired her to pursue a business degree and work as Director of Development for Young Women Empowered (Y-WE), a South Seattle-based nonprofit focused on life enrichment and skill building for women, trans, non-binary, and gender-expansive youth.
After one of Y-WE’s vans was vandalized and set on fire, the organization’s leadership reported the suspected arson to the Seattle Police Department.
Receiving no follow-up from SPD for weeks, according to her statement in the police report, Y-WE leadership reached out to the mayor’s office for assistance and was eventually connected to Gomez, as a representative of Mayor Bruce Harrell’s office.
After scheduling a meeting, Gomez, Delostrinos, and another Y-WE director, all met in late February to discuss the arson and how the city might be able to help the organization.
During the meeting, Gomez shared that he was a business owner of Kolors Studio. “He had expressed to me that he was somebody in the community doing really awesome things as an entrepreneur, and some of the things he was talking about really aligned with a lot of work that I was focusing on in supporting Black and Brown owned businesses,” Delostrinos told The Stranger.
The three discussed a possible partnership between Kolors and Y-WE, and scheduled another meeting to flesh out more details of the possibility.
Delostrinos, her colleague, and Gomez would next meet for a 90-minute discussion at Kolors studio in March of 2024. Gomez was joined by his business partner, and during the meeting, brought out a bottle of tequila for a celebratory drink. Delostrinos accepted out of politeness, but her colleague declined, stating to police that she passed on it because she felt uncomfortable due to the power imbalance with Gomez working at the mayor’s office, according to the police report. Still, the two both left excited at the potential of partnering with Kolors.
According to her statement in the police report, Delostrinos and Gomez met twice after that: once shortly after, when he asked if Delostrinos might be interested in working at Kolors; and again in May, when he invited her to a campaign party for Nick Brown that he hosted at Kolors, where he suggested they meet up again to talk more about Delostrinos, who was attending graduate school at the University of Washington Foster School of Business, joining the Kolors team.“At the time, I was going on a lot of informational interviews and connecting with people in community, nothing seemed out of the ordinary,” she says. “Every time we met was specifically about business,” she says.
Until it wasn’t.
We Can’t Do This
Delostrinos remembers the morning of June 18, 2024, as just another Tuesday. After graduating from the University of Washington’s Business School, she’d hit the ground running, catching up with neglected business contacts and leaving no stone unturned on career prospects.
Still interested in pursuing a job with Kolors, she and Gomez had agreed to meet at Charlotte Restaurant & Lounge at the Lotte Hotel less than a block away from Gomez’s City Hall office, according to her statement in the police report.
Scheduled to meet at 4:30 pm, Gomez was running late so Delostrinos had already ordered a margarita when he arrived about 15 minutes later from a barbecue he’d been attending at the mayor’s office, according to the police report. He shared that he’d already been drinking at the barbecue, and then ordered a shot of tequila for himself.
“He asked if I wanted one. I told him no. And he was like, well, I’ll get one for you, and if you don’t finish it, I’ll finish it for you,” she says.
According to the police report, the two talked about Kolors needs and its investors, with Gomez name-dropping several prominent figures he and his company were associated with. The conversation turned to the public sexual assault allegations against former chief of police Adrian Diaz, and Gomez commented that was the reason he made Kolors a “safe space” for women.
Delostrinos told police that the conversation soon turned to a restaurant called Mercado Luna on Capitol Hill, where Gomez claimed he was an investor. He then ordered another shot of liquor and asked her if she wanted another. She said no because she was driving. But Gomez ordered another for her anyway, telling her he’d finish it if she didn’t. Delostrinos says she felt pressured to drink it.
Having drank, but eaten little at the cafe, Gomez asked Delostrinos if she wanted to go to Mercado Luna. At that point, Delostrinos told police that she didn’t suspect that Gomez was hitting on her, but feeling too tipsy to drive at the moment, she accepted a ride in Gomez’s BMW to the restaurant. She told police that she texted her fiance her whereabouts, as the two typically did if one was going to be out a little later than planned.
As soon as they entered the restaurant, Delostrinos said she needed to use the restroom. Already going beyond her typical two-drink maximum on a weekday, she intended only to eat at the restaurant. However, when she returned to the table, she was surprised to see an unwanted margarita and a shot of Mezcal waiting for her, according to her statement in the police report.
At the restaurant, Gomez seemed very familiar with the restaurant staff and introduced her to the owner, but, she told The Stranger, the vibe started to feel a little off. “After a while, I started to feel like I wasn’t safe. I texted my fiancé and best friend like ‘I just wanted you to know that I’ll probably need a ride at some point.’”
According to the police report, she also texted her fiancé that she was uncertain about Gomez’s intentions, but that she was okay and making business moves.
At this point, according to the police report, Delostrinos shared she was drunk, and unsure whether or not she had finished her drinks. She told police that she did recall eating there and Gomez asking her why she was attracted to her fiance.
The report shows that she called three Lyfts that night, at 10:10 pm, 10:18 pm, and 10:24 pm, but never got into any of them.
According to her statements in the police report, the time leading up to being in Gomez’s South Lake Union apartment is a bit of a blur. She ended up back in Gomez’s car after not getting into a Lyft, and then at an apartment at Dexter Apartments.
Delostrinos reported that she later found herself at Gomez’s apartment on his bed with some of her clothing removed and damaged. She regained consciousness while Gomez was performing nonconsensual sexual acts on her, according to her statements to the police. According to the police report, she verbally told Gomez “no, I don’t want to do this” but Gomez proceeded to attempt to nonconsensually force his way on top of her and kiss her. She got off the bed and struggled to find her phone and belongings.
In her statement to the police, she then describes a struggle: She sat down at a table in the apartment, stating they were supposed to have been “discussing business, not this.” Gomez offered her a drink, which she did not accept, and then, according to the police report, continued to pull her towards him, lift her, and throw her onto the bed. She repeated, no, she didn’t want to, and got off the bed again to find her phone. She told the police that her purse was in Gomez’s car, and she couldn’t recall whether or not she went with him to retrieve it, but she was able to get her phone and finally call a Lyft home. She found that her fiance had previously texted her several times, but he hadn’t heard back from her.
Speaking to investigators in September, Gomez gave his version of the night. He stated that their June 18 encounter was the first time he and Delostrinos had hung out and that they both drank until the bar closed in Belltown. Afterward, he told the police, the two decided to get more drinks at his apartment, where he says Delostrinos initiated a kiss, but he was uncomfortable because of her relationship, and he rejected it.
Police found that the apartment Gomez took Delostrinos to was not actually leased to him, though he was listed as an emergency contact on it.
Delostrinos told police that she returned home at 1:30 am. Her fiance told the police that he could smell alcohol on her before she reached the doorway of their bedroom, where she stumbled in. He told investigators that he was shocked at the sight, as he’d never seen Delostrinos this drunk before.
“I was inebriated and non coherent when I got home,” she told The Stranger. “I’m called the grandma of all my friends because I literally go to bed at 8:30 pm every day. So for me to be out at 1:30 in the morning—it’s just out of character for me.”
Her fiance told police that Delostrinos told him what had transpired that evening.
Delostrinos woke up feeling awful the next day, with an extreme headache, severe dehydration, bruises on her body, and vomiting several times throughout the morning, according to the police report.
She texted her best friend to tell her about the previous night. Delostrinos coordinated with a friend’s husband to retrieve her purse back from Gomez, according to the police report.
According to her statements in the police report, Delostrinos expressed to her friend that she was fearful of the power dynamics present— Gomez was, after all, in a high position at the mayor’s office, and had previously boasted of being connected to powerful people — she knew the immediate next step.
When asked to respond to Delostrinos’ allegations and the public police report, Gomez’s attorney, Joshua R. Saunders, provided The Stranger with the following statement:
“Pedro Gomez has been an advocate for equity and social justice for his entire career. He has done nothing wrong and strongly denies these allegations. We are confident that he will be fully exonerated when all of the facts are known.”
Making Violence Visible
“Being somebody that has supported survivors of sexual assault, you always want to have as many options as you can—whether or not you’re going to move forward. I’ve told enough people in my life to go get a rape kit done that I knew it was something I had to do as well,” Delostrinos says.
The process of getting a rape kit done is inherently invasive. She describes a grueling nine-hour process of different nurses, many of them male, popping in and out of a University of Washington hospital room, probing and asking her deeply invasive questions about her body less than 24 hours after experiencing the trauma of assault. It’s an experience, she says, she was only able to endure with the support of her fiance.
“If he wasn’t there, I would have been like, ‘fuck this’. On top of that, I was emotionally and physically distressed. If I didn’t have an understanding of why it was important for me to be there, I would have left in 30 minutes,” she says. “I’m someone who has resources and knows this process. I can’t imagine being someone who went through a horrific experience with no support or knowledge of why different men are walking into the room asking about what just happened.”
What was worse, she says, was that she wouldn’t be able to see the results of her rape kit unless she filed a police report.
Delostrinos is an abolitionist, and she was hesitant to trust a criminal justice system she believed was focused on punishment, as opposed to any true restoration and healing of survivors of sexual assault.
It was a system that disproportionately incarcerated people of color and destroyed the lives of folks from marginalized communities while providing leniency to the powerful. By utilizing that same system, would she be validating its legitimacy?
What’s more, Delostrinos said that Gomez occupied multiple identities and was a Mexican man at a time when problematic, racist, and false narratives of Latino criminality had caused wildfire with at least a plurality of the electorate, intensifying during the most recent presidential election.
“It’s a really complex situation because of the multiple intersectional identities, when you’re going through this system, they don’t really care about us. Our [local communities of color and gender expansive communities have] seen that time and time again, but I wanted to make an intentional decision about what accountability would look like in terms of this harm,” she says.
Her decision to file a police report five days after the incident was principally driven by concern for others within her larger community. With Gomez’s access to community members and the assertion that he was creating a “safe space” for women of color, Delostrinos says she felt an obligation to protect other women of color from future abuse from Gomez.
“At the heart of most sexual violence is a misuse of power. There are many ways a person can have power—sometimes it is through a formal position, but sometimes it is informally gained through a community reputation. It is critically important that we understand this, and have clear and consistent processes in place, whether legally or through our communities, to make sure the people we put in power are not abusing it,” says Hendren.
Even with Gomez’s resignation from the city, he is still a prominent fixture within the greater Seattle Community as an entrepreneur with being the co-owner of Kolors Studios, a co-working and production space primarily serving communities of color.
Prior to being named the Director of External Affairs, Gomez worked in various external roles at The City for more than a decade, including as the Director of small business development in the City’s Office of Economic Development, and last year was named one of the Puget Sound Business Journal’s 40 under 40 honorees, awarded to rising stars in the local business community.
In an email to The Stranger, a spokesperson for the mayor’s office says that the City was informed of the investigation into the alleged sexual assault on September 24, and the City promptly placed Gomez on paid administrative leave pending the results of the investigation. Gomez was also barred from contacting City employees, engaging with community partners, or entering municipal offices while the investigation remained active.
The spokesperson further stated that the mayor’s office became aware on January 6 that the Seattle Police Department had referred the case to the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office. That same day, Gomez submitted his resignation, preempting any review of the allegations or subsequent action by the mayor’s office in response to the report.
Gomez had no prior reported allegations of sexual assault against him, according to the same spokesperson.
“Mayor Harrell believes that sexual assault and harassment are wholly unacceptable[…] Our office works to bring attention to power dynamics, recognizing that those from historically marginalized communities can most feel their impact. We always encourage survivors to come forward. The mayor appreciates the courage of this individual in sharing this with SPD.”
A King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office spokesperson says they are waiting for additional information from law enforcement sources in the coming weeks and expect to make a charging decision once that information is received.
“Community safety has always been at the forefront of what my goal for doing this is a part of the accountability process is removing a person from a position when they can potentially harm our community,” the spokesperson says.
Another driving force behind her decision to come forward was the urgent need to spotlight the pervasive harms of gender-based violence, a crisis increasingly normalized by the election of a president found civilly liable for sexual abuse—a president that has hand-picked cabinet nominees facing accusations of rape and sexual assault, underscoring the systemic nature of the issue and the stakes of remaining silent.
“I wanted to make visible the violence against women and that this could happen to anybody. This was a business meeting. This was somebody I knew. This was somebody in my community, in my activist community. I’m not looking to take him down. I’m looking to lean on the community to ask how we’re holding this person accountable,” says Delostrinos.
From her perspective, she doesn’t want perpetrators of violence to get what they “deserve”, in the punitive sense, but the assistance they need to overcome a pathology where harming women for sexual gratification is okay.
For her, the issue of violence against women is not just a personal pathology but a systemic failure, woven into the fabric of a culture that commodifies bodies and normalizes harm. She rejects the simplistic, punitive notion of giving perpetrators what they “deserve” and instead advocates for the need to address the root causes of their behavior. This means challenging the toxic ideologies and structures that enable violence, providing the resources and support necessary to fundamentally reshape destructive patterns. Justice goes beyond punishment to dismantling the systems that perpetuate harm in our society.
In her case, she’s found some of her own needs met in the ensuing months with the help of her network within the local social justice space. Of the 50 women she estimates she shared her story with, nearly 95% have, in turn, shared their own experiences of sexual assault—many for the first time.
By contrast, Delostrinos notes that many of the trusted men in her circle have expressed shock that this could happen to someone they know, highlighting the extent to which even many well-meaning cis men are unaware of the prevalence of sexual violence in the lives of women close to them.
Many of the questions they ask are what cis-straight men should be constantly asking themselves: What’s our role in fixing this? How do we make sure the people in power are held accountable? And how do we, as men, start noticing the subtle ways violence gets normalized in the world around us? And, how do we contribute to that violence, even if implicitly?
Those answers are not the product of mere navel-gazing, but of a willingness to sit with the weight of silence, to listen with an openness that demands humility. They require the kind of time that is not spent, but invested—the kind of time that is borne out of a desire for deep reflection and honest conversation. Only then can we begin to unravel the truths that live within us and between us.
“Some of the things that happened to these women and gender-expansive people I’ve spoken with happened to them as children. They’re now in their 30s, 40s, and 50s, and I’m the first person they opened up to,” she says.
These conversations have served as a needed social balm to her and also illuminated the limitations of society’s grace when it comes to current support offered to victims of gender-based violence.
“We don’t know how to support victims, and that’s why there aren’t enough people coming forward talking about the harm trauma and PTSD they experience every day. We have so much grace for the predator that when it comes to the victim, we see them as someone who’s broken,” says Delostrinos.
She shares that she suffers from PTSD as a result of the alleged assault. It’s prevented her from attending informational or networking interviews and has led her to decline job opportunities.
That’s why she laments a society beholden to a criminal justice system that prioritizes neither the transformation of the perpetrator nor the healing of the person they’ve harmed. It is not a system built for acts of repair. Unfortunately, it’s the system we have for now.
“So much violence is in the gray area in our society, it’s the hug that’s a little too long. It’s your boss touching you inappropriately, or your friend objectifying someone. So many cis, straight men have been socialized like this,” she says. “It’s why all of us have to have these conversations, so we can start building and creating safer spaces for people like me, for victims to not only have the justice they deserve, but the healing they deserve.”
If you or someone you know have been a victim of sexual assault, below are local resources to get the assistance you need.
988: the behavioral health and suicide support line, available 24/7.
Legal counsel at the Sexual Violence Law Center: Contact them by calling 844-991-7852, or emailing legalline@svlawcenter.org.
Harborview Center for Trauma and Abuse: Provides trauma-specific evaluation and mental health treatment for survivors of sexual violence.
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center: Provides advocacy for survivors of sexual assault.
WashingtonLawHelp.org: A free legal resource library that includes many legal information packets for survivors.
Additional reporting by Hannah Murphy Winter.
Editor’s Note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Gomez was previously the Director of the City’s Office of Economic Development. He was the director of small business development in the City’s Office of Economic Development. It also stated that in his most recent role, he was a liaison between the Mayor’s office and HHS, which was incorrect. Both have since been corrected in the story.

Sexual assault is obviously awful, and survivors have the absolute right to respond in whatever way is most beneficial to them. In that sense it’s entirely appropriate for Delostrinos to report this to police. But, once a person decides that police are the solution for accountability and community safety they can’t reasonably call themselves an abolitionist anymore.
And the vast majority of the SANE exam (“rape kit”) is only for gathering evidence for future prosecution. The criminal system retraumatizes victims because it is laser focused on punishment to the exclusion of all other concerns.
“ The criminal system retraumatizes victims because it is laser focused on punishment to the exclusion of all other concerns”
Such as? The progressive solution only focuses on the perpetrators and the external factors that forced them to commit this heinous act. They can’t even call people victims lest that negatively impact the aggressor and instead refer to them as those “affected by sexual assault”
@2 based on this comment it’s incredibly apparent you have not seriously engaged with any “progressive solution.” There is extensive study devoted to, for example, restorative justice and its positive psychological impact on victims. Here’s one example I found just by quickly googling:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240635/
@3 I’m sure that study is a great relief to the many people who have been impacted by sexual assault. If they don’t want to go along with that I guess they just need to get over it right?
@4 I mean this story you’re commenting on details how traumatic it is for victims to interact with our current criminal system. “If they don’t want to go along with that I guess they just need to get over it right?”
Abolish!!!
(Until I’m the one who gets hurt)
Despite over 4,000 words dedicated to the effort, this article does nothing to dispel the absurdity of the movement to abolish police. Quite the opposite, really. When the rubber hits the road, the ideology is revealed as totally vacuous and its adherents as performative.
I hope Ms. Delostrinos can find justice.
I expected so much more from this, Marcus. You have an “abolitionist” waffling about restorative justice, unaware of the privilege she possesses by even having an article written about her experience. And yet STILL she has the gall to say the only infrastructure that intimidates predators from acting more boldly should be dismantled on a pipe dream.
The countless cold cases in King County don’t get articles. Those women who’ve suffered because of violent, unrepentant monsters don’t get justice, restorative or otherwise. And The Stranger doesn’t give a single fuck, as long as they can keep virtue signaling.
If ANYONE in this comment section has tips or other information relating to cold cases in King County or the Seattle metro, go to seattlespitfire.com
You might get something meaningful there, unlike at this rag that The Stranger has become post-2015. How depressing that the new leadership is as weak as what it replaced.
When an avowed “abolitionist” seeks help from the Police is the exact moment you know that the “abolition” movement is bullshit. Everybody wants the law on their side when they’ve been victimized. The wealthy “abolitionists” go nowhere without private security. The whole “movement” was a waste of time, a waste of resources, greatly undermined the police and now we all get to suffer the results.
@10 “When an avowed “abolitionist” seeks help from the Police is the exact moment you know that the “abolition” movement is bullshit”
Or that person’s claim to be one is. This article is entirely unhelpful to the subject’s asserted cause, which calls into question either her and the author’s motivations or their thoughtfulness.
Delostrinos and Harrison Green fault the police for failing to do the job…of counselors, therapists, and psychologists.
“That’s why she laments a society beholden to a criminal justice system that prioritizes neither the transformation of the perpetrator nor the healing of the person they’ve harmed. It is not a system built for acts of repair.”
The job of the police is to stop crimes still in progress and gather evidence for the prosecution of crimes already committed.
Arguing that law enforcement professionals are illegitimate because they don’t moonlight as mental health professionals shows the absurdity of their Abolish sentiments.
@12 “Delostrinos and Harrison Green fault the police for failing to do the job…of counselors, therapists, and psychologists”
No, they fault the government for ONLY providing police, at great expense, when what is often more needed are counselors, therapists, etc. It’s like if you needed a screwdriver but all you had in your toolbox were fifteen hammers. You wouldn’t blame the hammers you’d be frustrated with whoever spent all the tool money on hammers.
@13 I agree from a leftist perspective that our criminal justice and law enforcement systems are completely broken, perhaps beyond repair. But frankly, you’re giving both the subject and author of this article far too much credit, and filling in your own insightfulness where theirs falls short.
The piece does not impart a rationale for therapy and counseling as a viable alternative to what Gomez allegedly perpetrated, to what Delostrinos experienced, or to her reaction to call the cops. It quickly skates past the irony of an abolitionist running to the law, only to fall back on well-worn progressive “we need more social workers and crime won’t happen” rhetoric to justify this cognitive dissonance, as if INVITING right-wing mockery.
Yes, we need more social workers. We need less racist, violent cops. And we need to treat victims less invasively and more humanely. But regardless of how utopian a system we hypothetically create, human beings will continue doing horrible things to each other. Denying that is idiotic.
Progressives must admit that “hammers”, criminal DNA profiles, and other punitive criminal justice mechanisms are foundationally necessary to discourage crimes that leave DNA evidence.
@13 But the Abolish crowd does not ONLY advocate the hiring of more social workers. They also advocate Abolishing the police. It’s not a both/and ideology. They do blame the hammers and wish to get rid of them altogether.
The article clearly describes the behavior of an experienced sexual predator. Whether or not the facts in this case hold up in court, our society has many experienced sexual predators, many of whom do not regard their behaviors as predatory. Some number of them will neither self-reform, or voluntarily accept aid. They belong in jail, both to keep future potential victims safe, and as examples to both other existing, and would-be, predators.
Jailing as many sexual predators as we can now helps build the future we want, where predation is less likely. Jail isn’t the only tool to build that future, but it is an essential one.
@1 have we entered the “no true scotsman” era of popular abolitionist discourse? I guess the folks at DecrimSeattle, No New Youth Jail folks, and other self-described abolitionists who are actively participating and asking others to show up for the criminal trial of Elijah Lewis’s murderer should also lose that language from their vocabulary… or anyone who participates in current processes involving police and prisons as a way to seek safety and accountability — using your definition (or is this just a critique for victims of sexual violence who report)?
If abolition is a practical program for change, furthering life affirming institutions of care and self-determination (to summarize one definition from Ruth Wilson Gilmore), perhaps a better critique would be that local abolitionist groups have not set up (nor succeeded in building real momentum for) successful alternative systems for community safety and accountability that can be utilized for victims, victims’ families and the wider community — particularly dealing with severe cases of inter-personal harm (murder, rape, DV, etc.). The fact that the most successful “abolitionist” or rehabilitative programming seems to be happening in prison (Black Prisoners Caucus, Prison Feminism, etc.), is not something I’ve ever seen publicly explored – but doing so would seemingly strengthen the larger conversation for change versus the direction of “don’t call yourself an abolitionist” if you call the police ever.
@3, So if someone refuses to participate in restorative justice (e.g. won’t pay reparations, won’t go to mandated treatment, won’t do _ mandated by the court) then what? Do they just walk free? Or are they incarcerated?
If it’s the latter and not the former, then its not abolitionist is it? If its not the latter, then why would the perpetrator participate in the restorative justice? If they were willing to do the right thing voluntarily, they would not be in front of the criminal justice adjudicator in the first place would they?
If its the former, then the incentive is to just ignore the courts.
Participation costs the perpetrator more than not participating, so why participate in restorative justice?
Intellectual trainwreck.
@17 showing up to support a person or their family is not the same as initiating a police report and pursuing prosecution and eventual incarceration. And yes, someone who claims to be an abolitionist but does the later is a hypocrite at best, because the entire premise of abolition is that police and prisons are not an appropriate or pro-social response to harm. It’s like a “vegetarian” who eats meat, or a “Scotsman” who was born and lived their entire life in say Germany. Their actions don’t support their claims.
@20 No, the call to action is literally to flood the courtroom and “demand accountability”. That is participating in and seeking accountability from the current court system for this murder. That is quite literally participating in the prosecution process and likely incarceration.
By your words, they should no longer be calling themselves abolitionists because the seek the policing and prisons as the response to harm in this case. Either this is a consistent argument or you only wield it here against woman who has been raped.