Ok weather to vote in! Should be a pretty nice day to stroll down to your nearest ballot box, with a high of 52 degrees and partly sunny, and a slight chance of rain after 2 p.m. 

So go vote! Don’t let anything stop you. As Hannah said yesterday, you can still vote! I voted last year on the last possible day, and I hadn’t registered yet at that point. I just jogged down to Lumen Field though and it was super easy to register, vote, and leave. Even if you’re feeling left out because you’re not in a swing state and the entirety of the country’s future doesn’t rest on your shoulders, the future of this state and city really does! Dropping some helpful links to make sure you have everything you need to make your voices heard. First, how to register to vote. Second, how to replace a lost ballot. Thirdly, ballot box locations. Finally, our handy cheat sheet for help filling out your ballot. 

Done your civic duty already? Well then sit back and enjoy the final hours of uncertainty at one of the many election night parties happening across the city tonight. The Stranger is throwing one at the Crocodile—it’s sold out, but we think it’s worth it to take your chances on standby tickets. There might be some no-shows, and we can squeeze you in. But if you don’t wanna chance it, check out this list of parties you can attend from our sister publication Everout. Stranger reporters will be dotted around the city to bring you coverage of the election from various candidate election parties as well.

Speaking of voting: The Boeing machinists approved a contract last night ending their strike after 53 days, according to the Seattle Times. The latest contract, approved by 59% of membership, includes a 38% general wage increase over the next four years, which equates to 43% when you factor in raises on top of raises. The contract did not restore the pension that they lost in a contentious vote 10 years ago. Union president Jon Holden said the union should be proud of what they accomplished and that it was time to get back to building planes.

Alleged sex abuse in youth detention: An additional 176 people made allegations against Washington state for failing to protect them from sexual abuse while they were children at youth detention centers in the state, according to the Seattle Times. Combined with another lawsuit filed in September, that brings the total number of people claiming they were sexually abused in Washington’s detention centers up to almost 400. Meanwhile, the Seattle Times Editorial Board continues to decry and complain about youth diversion programs meant to help kids avoid being sent into lock up.

Seattle Steel Pan Project Evicted: The Seattle Steel Pan Project, dedicated to teaching the art of steel plan music and performance, needs a new space to operate in after MLK FAME Community Center in the Central District evicted the group this week, according to an Instagram post from the project. In the post, the group accused MLK FAME of bowing to the demands of neighborhood “Karens” who complained about the groups weekly practice. I reached out to MLK FAME for a response, who did not immediately reply, but I’ll update if they do. In the meantime, the project is asking everyone they know if they have any ideas where they can house their steel pan band. Their email address is steelpanproject@gmail.com. Here’s a little taste of what they do:

Ok. Moving on. Let’s talk about the presidential election: Let’s be real, no one knows how this election will shake out. The polls are insanely tight in swing states. Dixville Notch, a tiny New Hampshire town that votes at midnight every year on Election Day, tallied up their six votes which resulted in a tie, with three votes for Vice President Kamala Harris, and three for former President Donald Trump. There is a very good chance we don’t know the election result tonight, and maybe not for a couple days.

Battleground states prepare for certification fight: Given the resistance to certifying the vote in swing states in the last election cycle, many officials have already started to prepare to quash attempts by county officials to squabble over valid election results, according to Politico. Election officials fear if Trump loses, he won’t just fade quietly into the night, and instead will mount another attempt to overturn election results.

Meanwhile, the two parties also are wrestling for control of congress. New York stands out as a battleground state for the House, as the congressional seats they lost in 2022 helped Republicans take the chamber back, according to Politico. Meanwhile in Texas, Democrats continue to try to take Senator Ted Cruz’s seat, and while Cruz continues to lead, Representative Colin Allred is within spitting distance of him. But, it’s wholly unpredictable who will control what in 2025.

But for some good news: One of my top five favorite creatures in the world continues to beat the odds. A cloned black-footed ferret mother in Virginia gave birth to two little baby ferrets in June, according to the Washington Post. Unclear why we’re only hearing about it now. We should have rang the bells. If you don’t know much about black-footed ferrets, you’re really missing out. These little bandits scurry across our prairie lands, and has supposedly gone extinct twice, but they’re resilient AF. Now with the cloning and the babies, we could continue to see this species soldier on. Ugh I love them so much, I’ve been obsessed with them ever since I lived in Montana. And I’m not a ferret girl, it’s just they’re little markings make them look like they have a tiny black Zorro mask across their smol faces. Here is a video of them being adorable:

I’m so excited about this cloning thing: Instead of a musical recommendation, another video about black footed ferrets.

 

Ashley Nerbovig is a staff writer at The Stranger covering policing, incarceration and courts. She is like other girls.

28 replies on “Slog AM: Election Day Pretties, Boeing Machinists’s Strike Ends, Cloned Blackfooted Ferret Gives Birth”

  1. I have no clue what’s going to happen in this presidential election, but if Trump wins, it won’t be because of the people who voted for him; it will be because of the people who couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Harris because she didn’t pass one purity test or another. And that will be thanks to the sweeping disinformation campaign being waged to dissuade gullible, impressionable people from casting their vote for Harris. If they didn’t have the Israeli apartheid regime’s ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank to hang their hat on, they’d find something else.

    We are facing the most important moral and ethical test that any of us has faced as American citizens, and this is a pass/fail test. The only way for us to pass this test is to vote for Kamala Harris, however much we may have to hold our nose to do so. For any other choice we make, including making no choice, we fail.

    Hey, Trump normalizers and Sawant supporters out there, go right ahead and tell me what an elitist I am to have the temerity to be expressing my own opinion like this.

  2. Yeah, go to the Stranger’s party at the Crocodile tonight. Buy some drinks so owner Marcus Charles can take your money and contribute to his Right Wing cause du jour.

    Music? Whatever, fine, but It’s so fucking lame of you guys to have an ELECTION PARTY at a Marcus Charles venue.

  3. @4 Because more people voting is a good thing, even if they are people who don’t agree with me. If you start premising who can vote by how they vote, you’re on a very long and slippery slope.

    By the way, a few months back you said that you were going to try to convince Trump voters to vote for Harris by listening honestly to them and their concerns. How did that work out? How many people did you talk to? Did you convince anyone?

  4. @1 isn’t also because of jerrymandered districts and the electoral college, which is the only reason a republican president has won at all in the last couple decades? Systemic barriers to truly democratic represtation aside, I respect your right to blame a few progressives for how close to outright authoritarian nationalism we are.

  5. @1: Brava! All I can add is:

    It used to be, “lesser of two evils.” This is our third consecutive round of “obviously totally unqualified vs. extremely well qualified.”

    At least if the issue was Ukraine, the sides would be clear, and relevant to U.S. voters. Ancient tribal conflicts out in some faraway desert don’t really concern us at all.

  6. Dale Horseman @8, quick questions. How are you casting YOUR vote in this presidential election? How would you encourage others to cast their votes?

    Asking on behalf of those who would like to save our nation from “outright authoritarian nationalism.”

  7. @8: “…blame a few progressives for how close to outright authoritarian nationalism we are.”

    Persons whose only participation in our democratic process consists of making demands, and then not voting when those demands are not met, deserve all of the blame and derision the rest of us can possibly pile onto them.

  8. You have to feel a little sorry for Colin Allred; being within spitting distance of Cruz for so long, but somehow Colin is suddenly the bad guy if he takes that opportunity.

  9. @7, There are lots of folks voting for Trump that are horrified by his character.

    Some of them, are like the six folks in Dixville Notch (4 R, 2 I) that voted for Haley in the open NH primary.

    Flash forward to today. 3 went for Trump and 3 for Harris.

    I haven’t talked to the three, but any number that are probably like them. As uncomfortable as they are with Trump, the policy positions of Progressives are a bridge too far for them. So the way to vanquish Trumpism is for Progressives to realize that they must restrain their aspirations. Some of them are poison pills to the other side. Do you want Trump, or be willing to give up the poison pills?

    There are correlaries going the other way. There are Republican, otherwise conservative, suburban women voters, voting for Harris over abortion restrictions. That issue is a bridge to far, causing them to vote against Republicans.

    There are other issues like that, such as a balanced budgets, where Fiscal Conservatives have restrained themselves. Its not possible to have that without cutting entitlements. That is a bridge too far and they know it. W. tried to raise it and use his popular political capital after Saddam fell to pursue it. The more he tried the worse it got. A bridge too far. So to keep his other priorities he abandoned it.

    So both sides insisting that if they win they will cram their maximalist policy aspirations down the losing side’s throat, with no restraint or nod to some of the losing sides biggest concerns, leaves us here, with the Progressives bringing the largest numbers of bridge too far issues.

    So keep making the perfect the enemy of the good, and we will keep facing Trumpism, even if Trump keels over tomorrow from some natural cause (I can only hope). Are Progressives prepared ti accept 70% of what they want to keep durable, stable, tolerant governing majorities by not trying to enact the 30% that is a poison pill to the other side?

    A durable Republic can’t be one where the majority enacts everything they want because they won the last election.

    My more sarcasic point was that The Stranger, and Progressive’s, aren’t as principled as you on voting. When they talk about more people voting, its usually more people who they think will vote the way they want, not more people voting.

    Also what if the Majority, in a pure Majoritarian system is tyrannical? Is the purpose of government to allow the majority to act without restraint to impose what they decide, or is it to collectively secure as much individual freedom and autonomy as possible? If its the latter, then you want enough speedbumps for the majority imposing their will so tyranny by majority is thwarted. You want some anti-democratic mechanisms to offset majoritarian ones. The balance is tough.

  10. 15 the amount of time you waste making up stupid bullshit stories about other people so you can tell them they’re wrong is wild. News flash, everyone would prefer it if more voters voted their way because that would mean their preferences are more likely to win, but you can still have a principled belief about voting rights for everyone regardless of their preferences.

    If you don’t have a direct quote of someone saying “I only want more people who I think will vote the way I want, not more people voting” then what the fuck do you think you’re achieving by pretending that’s what they think? Tearing down straw men is loser behavior.

    Also re your last paragraph, pretty fucking dim for a self-declared constitutional scholar to not understand how the fucking thing works and why it exists. We don’t rein in the tyranny of the majority through “anti-democratic mechanisms” because that makes no fucking sense. We do it through the judiciary, dumbass.

  11. bibi fired one of his chief

    Warlords someone not very

    Pro-Genocide who also doesn’t

    gotta prolong, Expand his get-outta

    Prison Middle Eastern Debacle fired him

    in a signal to the donold that the Skids’ll be

    Properly Greased for djt’s little Dynasty. so sorry, Victims.

    there was

    Nothing

    could be

    Done

  12. @16, Then why are supposedly non-partisan groups that encourage voter registration confining their efforts to demographic areas that tend to register more of one party or ideology than another? Why do funders of such groups pick groups in geographic/demographic areas that tend to favor a particular world view?

    I have yet to see one of those so called non-partisan groups target geographic/demographic areas in a non-partisan way. I.e. The group does the same amount of new voter registration effort in Rainier Beach as they do in say Omak.

    They often target so called under-represented groups as well, as long as they know that the group has a disposition to voter more for certain candidates rather than others.

    When I see The Stranger arguing as vociferously for increasing voter participation rates in say East King County as in Seattle, or among old voters as young ones, I’ll take claims that its principled, not partisan, or ideological, seriously.

  13. @15 Remind me again what Progressive poison pills I’ve made my hill to die on? What I’ve said is a bridge too far and I’d prefer Trump to a Democrat who can’t do _? Oh, yeah, you can’t. Because you’re making shit up again. Nice try, but a little transparent. 3/10.

    Oh, and you didn’t mention whether you actually changed any minds in your massive voter outreach effort.

    @18 You’re the one who said that felons shouldn’t get the right to vote because they’re Trumpsters. You might have forgotten, it was only back at #4. So why are you saying that The Stranger or any Progressive group would oppose felons getting the right to vote? That’s your own straw man. Congratulations on knocking it down. You look very smug on the overturned bales.

    Oh hey, it’s a very short wait for your last question! The Stranger advocated for all-mail voting and removing postage requirements for mail-in ballots, which increases turnout for everyone, including the good people of Omak or East King County.

  14. 18, These are two different concepts that you are treating interchangeably:

    -Someone working on behalf of a group whose goal is to register voters who are most likely to vote for the party/policies preferred by the group (I wouldn’t consider this work non-partisan, though technically it may be so because you cannot guarantee how anyone will vote once registered and can’t turn someone away if they declare intentions that don’t align with your interests)

    -An individual person with basic principles about voting rights and the belief that everyone should be able to vote

  15. Bibi fired one of his chief warlords, someone not very pro-genocide, who also doesn’t got to prolong, expand his get out of prison Middle Eastern debacle. Fired him in a signal to the Donald that the skids will be properly greased for DJT’s little dynasty. So sorry, victims, there was nothing that could be done.

  16. @19, Sarcasm on felons voting. The Stranger and some Progressive legislators have called for that. Now that they understand it will hurt their causes, I think they will abandon the line I sarcastically took.

    @20, “An individual person with basic principles about voting rights and the belief that everyone should be able to vote.” The test of that is whether they, and groups they participate in or support, do it across the geographic and demographic board.

    There are a ton of 501(c)(3) organizations out there that are required to be non-partisan, but they only do door-belling and other register to vote efforts in areas that lean way more progressive in their voting and target demographic groups that vote more progressive.

    In Washington State, if rural voters turned out at the same rate as urban and suburban voters, the state would be much more competitive for statewide offices. That is the definition of an under-represented group. Find a serious 501(c)(3) trying to register more of those voters and getting them to turn out with Mark Zukkerberg’s money? You can’t.

    I don’t give a rats ass whether rural voters register and vote at the same rate as urban voters. Not voting also influences the outcome and not voting can be a message that these voters don’t see the outcome they might get from voting to be worth the effort they would have to make.

    I am just pointing out the dishonesty of these groups that say, “We just want to get more people to vote.” Nope, they want certain under-represented groups that will break more one way than the other, to vote, and they target areas where those groups are, and willfully aren’t active in others. E.g. A non-profit is formed to educate and help people register to vote, and participate in elections in NYC and nowhere else. Since the City went 76% for Biden, is that really non-partisan and founded on the principle of expanding voter participation solely for the sake of increasing voter participation?

  17. nyt

    TRUMP STORMS BACK

    Stunning Return to Power After Dark and Defiant Campaign

    His Win Opens a New Era of Uncertainty for the Nation

    Donald Trump played on fears of immigrants and economic anxieties to defeat Vice President Kamala Harris.

    He triumphed despite a criminal conviction, indictments, an assassin’s bullet, accusations of authoritarianism and an unprecedented switch of his opponent.

    Nov. 6, 2024, 5:39 a.m.

    more, depressingly

    more depressingly:

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/11/06/us/trump-election-harris-news

  18. Here’s How Badly Kamala Harris

    Has Lost Arab American Voters

    Voters in Dearborn, Michigan,

    the largest majority Arab American city,

    have delivered a stunningly bad verdict on Democrats.

    In a rebuke of the Biden administration’s handling of Israel’s brutal bombing campaign of Gaza and Lebanon, the city of Dearborn, Michigan, has broken in favor of Donald Trump, with 39.6 percent of votes cast.

    Dearborn is the largest majority Arab American city in the country, and as of 11:35 p.m. EST Trump had 46.8 percent of the vote compared to 27.8 percent of the vote for Harris and 22 percent for Green Party Candidate Jill Stein. In 2020, Joe Biden won the city with a 74.2 percent of the vote, compared to 24.2 percent for Trump.

    https://newrepublic.com/post/188048/michigan-dearborn-arab-americans-election-harris-trump-stein

    who’s “Uncommitted” now?

    but not

    to worry: the

    “D”NC’ll figure out

    a whole New Way to

    snatch defeat outta the

    jaws of Genocide oh & the

    Bankrupting of Both Medicare

    & Social Security* in 2028 & beyond!

    And yeah

    Trumpf’ll be

    Horrific on Palestine:

    that’ll show them Arabs

    to support the ‘d’nc Next Time

    *pardon Me:

    the Privatization

    of our social safety nets.

  19. @27: So, Sawant succeeded in her goal of defeating Harris in Michigan, to “punish” Harris for her stance on Gaza?

    Sawant certainly seems to have earned her place in history. Helping to elect Trump will forever be her greatest legacy.

    You must be so proud of the support you’ve long given Sawant. You and the Stranger both.

    Please enjoy the second Trump presidency. Sawant, you, and the Stranger have well earned every last bit of it.

Comments are closed.