Sadly, the debate rules prevent Biden from wearing his emotional support sunglasses. Credit: WIN MCNAMEE / GETTY

Gooooooooood morning. Expect some rain this a.m. and into the afternoon. High of 65 degrees. Typical Seattle summer weather.ย 

Presidential debate starts at 6 pm tonight: President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump plan to have a little chat tonight, with CNN’s Jake Tapper and Dana Bash moderating the conversation. People can stream the debate for free from CNN’s site, and multiple networks plan to carry the debate. CNN has really limited how much can happen, with no studio audience and a plan to mute candidates’ microphones except for when it’s their turn to speak. Should be pretttttttty boring, but it’ll be fun to watch Biden topple off the stage as he swings right on immigration.ย 

Mayor announces plans to expand dual dispatch responders: Mayor Bruce Harrell announced plans to grow the City’s Community Assisted Response and Engagement (CARE) team from six responders to 24 and to expand their response areas from just downtown to Capitol Hill and the Central District. The CARE team represents Seattle’s attempt to create a policing alternative, an effort that the Seattle police union has continuously stymied, leaving the team underutilized. Harrell plans to revisit the limitations on the program in negotiations with the union, according to the Seattle Times.

Judge catches jurors chatting about verdict in cop’s trial: The murder trial of Auburn police officer Jeffrey Nelson had a bit of a hiccup yesterday when King County Superior Court Judge Nicole Gaines Phelps found out that two jurors had talked about the case outside of jury deliberations. Nelson is on trial for killing 26-year-old Jesse Sarey outside an Auburn grocery store in 2019. According to KUOW, one of the jurors told another juror, “‘[Weโ€™re] not here to be best friends. The 12 of us are here because one person was killed and another person is on trial.'” Honestly, that juror sounds like no fun. Why not leave a jury with 11 new best friends? What a loser.

ICYMI:ย Republican City Attorney Ann Davison’s office dismissed charges this week against a protester who slapped a pro-Palestine sticker on a McDonald’s sign earlier this year. The officers recommended charges against the protester under the same property destruction law that other Seattle police officers arrested two protestors for in 2019 after they wrote mean stuff about the cops outside the East Precinct. A jury awarded those protesters $680,000, saying the officers violated their rights to free speech.

Wanna hang out? Have you already set your plans for the weekend, or do you wanna maybe go to Trans Pride on Friday with me? Maybe? Ok, what about, Fremont Dungeness Festival on Saturday? We can eat a bunch of crab? Oh, ok, maybe again. Fine, you pick something, we’ve written up 39 things to do this week and weekend, so you just pick and let me know. You tell me when you’re ready to be friends.ย 

Bolivian General tried a coup and failed:ย Armored vehicles rammed into the doors of Bolivia’s government palace Wednesday in what Bolivian President Luis Arce described as an attempted coup, according to the Associated Press. A top general led the ramming effort, and Arce appeared to lose control of his country’s military for a few hours before he named a new army commander, who told the troops to stand down, which they did. Honestly, I don’t understand the dynamics here, but imagine following orders to do a coup and then following orders not to do a coup. Like, if you’re couping a guy, why are you listening to him tell you not to coup? [Eds note: The general said Arce directed him to do the coup in order to create a scene that might raise his dismal approval ratings given the economic crisis currently gripping the country, so that could be it, but Arce denies that.]

US Supreme Court pauses rule to reduce interstate pollution: SCOTUS has temporarily halted an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule meant to help curb the amount of air pollution that drifts over state lines. In a 5-4 ruling, the justices said the rule cannot go into effect while a lower court challenge plays out. In a girls versus boys ruling, Amy Coney Barrett joined with the three liberal justices in their dissent.

Speaking of SCOTUS: The court also ruled Thursday that it plans to allow Idaho’s ban on all abortions, except in emergency cases, according to the Associated Press. An earlier version of the decision that the court accidentally posted before quickly removing from its site allowed the state to prevent abortions even in a medical emergency. However, the ruling was mostly procedural, and the court may soon take up the issue of whether abortions can be banned without any exceptions, even in emergency cases.

And one more SCOTUS decision: The court overturned an anti-corruption law that prevented public officials from accepting gifts of more than $5,000 from government contractors that previously won a contract from a local government. The decision somehow drew a line between straight-up bribery and rewarding a government official for a favor. I wonder why SCOTUS would want to create a permissive environment for big gifts to government officials.

But why not one more while we’re at it? In perhaps the scariest decision of the day outside of the abortion one, in a 6-3 vote the justices defanged the US Securities Exchange Commission, forcing the agency to take financial fraudsters to federal trial when seeking civil penalties against them. Taking cases to court rather than just using department authority to administer fines requires money and staff the agency just doesn’t have and likely will not get from Congress. Mark Joseph Stern over at Slate argues the decision would apply to the Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Communications Commission, making it much harder to enforce penalties against bad bosses, tech companies, and deceptive corporations.ย 

Happy Pride!ย Enjoy a preview of SOPHIE’s posthumous album.ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

ย 

Ashley Nerbovig is a staff writer at The Stranger covering policing, incarceration and courts. She is like other girls.

49 replies on “Slog AM: Mayor to Expand Dual Dispatch, SCOTUS Drops Some Bad Rulings, Biden and Trump Debate This Evening”

  1. I stopped reading at “but it’ll be fun to watch Biden topple off the stage as he swings right on immigration” because your privilege is blinding, Ashley.

  2. i think you mean “swinging to the center on the asylum seeker crisis.” there’s no one who thinks the current situation is acceptable.

    interesting that you want Biden to fall, and not the sociopath that will be sitting across from him.

  3. @4

    No. I think they said exactly what they meant.

    Any bets on whether the person who put that genocide sticker in the McDonaldโ€™s window will be casting a vote for the guy the left routinely refers to as Genocide Joe?

  4. if The Rules

    don’t Prevent it

    perhaps smoulderin’ Joe

    might flaunt a pair of those

    mood-ring-inspired glasses:

    blue for all’s well

    brown for Eltrumpsfter’s

    massive Lying dumps

    Fire Engine Red for indignation

    mirrors for any mentions of

    bibi nutnyahooโ€™s Genocide

    yellow for Cadet Bonespursโ€™

    fetid record of Military Service

    and green for any

    Mentions of Mother Nature

    whom the Capitalists HATE most of All.

    Sic ’em,

    Joe!

  5. If the definition requires wiping an entire people off the map then there has never been a single genocide in all of human history.

  6. I fail to comprehend why ANYONE would watch the debate. Nothing constructive will happen. There will be no information shared that anyone with more than one brain cell doesn’t already know. No one’s mind will be changed as everyone has already chosen for whom they will vote.

    It’s just a fucking clown show. This country should be ashamed and sickened by the fact that we’re supposed to believe these are the two guys who are best suited to be the Commander in Chief from 2025-2029.

    And while everyone pretends any of this matters, SCOTUS continues to destroy the country, one ruling at a time. The United States of Israel is on fire. It’s a huge fucking dumpster fire that NO ONE is even attempting to even THINK ABOUT trying to figure out how to put out.

  7. @10: After 3.5 years of the Biden Admin, I can’t think of another individual better suited to do that shitty job.

    No one can put out the American dumpster fire. It is the Eternal Flame.

  8. @9: Heck, the actual definition of โ€œgenocideโ€ doesnโ€™t even require the murder of a single person. There are at least two other ways to do it:

    โ€œโ€ฆgenocide means any of the following acts committed with

    intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as

    such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;

    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its

    physical destruction in whole or in part;

    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.โ€

    (https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf)

    Note Hamasโ€™ 10/7 attacks in Israel appear to satisfy at least (a) and (b), and also (d) if their mutilation of womenโ€™s genitals suffices.

    Itโ€™s a testimony to the quality of the Strangerโ€™s contribution to civic dialog that, after eight months of both the Stranger and multiple commenters here using the word daily, they still cite body counts as proof of โ€œgenocideโ€.

  9. @12 Someone in touch with the times, such as willing to acknowledge that this economy isn’t working for most Americans (72% living from paycheck to paycheck) would be infinitely better suited to handle Trump populist demagoguery. This could well be a repeat of 2016 and for the same reasons.

  10. Okay, so both Hamas and Israel have met some of the criteria genocide. Cool.

    I donโ€™t think the term needs to be applicable to be morally repulsed by the actions of either side. I just find a proxy debate over the definition of a word to be intentionally avoiding the point, as though you can reference a dictionary entry and all the death and destruction is rendered moot. It doesn’t change anything about what’s happening at the present moment, nor anybody’s feelings about it.

  11. @17: There are plenty of words to describe the humanitarian disaster which Hamasโ€™ terrorists have brought upon the civilians of Gaza. Is it entirely unreasonable to ask writers to know the definitions of words they use, and use only the words they know?

    Or are they using โ€œgenocideโ€ because they want to win the argument by declaration, i.e. โ€œif you donโ€™t agree with us, then you support genocide?โ€ Because that would be dishonest, instead of merely ignorant.

  12. Fingers crossed in hopes of a campaign-ending meltdown by Trump that forces the Rs to nominate someone sane. Or a campaign-ending gaffe by Biden that forces the Ds to nominate someone electable.

  13. For all who don’t give a shit about Gaza being wiped off the face of the earth and every Palestinian life along with it (especially the children, I mean you aren’t even pretending to give a shit about tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of CHILDREN being slaughtered, starved, orphaned, having to have limbs amputated, etc. etc. etc.), it’s astonishing that none of you give a shit about HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF AMERICAN TAXPAYER DOLLARS being used to do it!!!!

    Meanwhile homelessness and hunger explode in the United States (where Biden is such a great leader) and the “cost of living” (why is that even a thing) is so grossly out of pace with what corporations and the top 1% are hoarding in wealth is just as incomprehensible.

    Bitch about homeless people.

    Bitch about the price of groceries or gas or the cost of whatever you choose to bitch about on any given day at any given moment and yet…

    Bitch about not being able to afford anything.

    Bitch about protesters ruining everything.

    Bitch and bitch and bitch and bitch and yet…

    Support Israel’s slaughter and starvation of 2.3 million people and the devastation they have done in Gaza with American weapons (which by the way has a significant impact on the world’s climate).

    The cognitive dissonance you all live in is not just astonishing, it’s downright psychotic.

  14. @19, People are using the English language to express their feelings about an ongoing humanitarian crisis, and as youโ€™ve helpfully pointed out, some of the UNโ€™s genocide criteria are applicable to Israelโ€™s efforts in Gaza. You certainly have no problem getting your point across given the multiple daily walls of text youโ€™ve posted about it, and I doubt it would be a challenge to identify instances where youโ€™re reaching if anyone were so inclined. Iโ€™m sure some already have.

    Everyone is communicating with the words they find appropriate, including you. I would ask you to chill out because weโ€™re just a bunch of nobodies blowing off steam here but teetering on the brink of a meltdown appears to be your resting state.

  15. “Today’s [USSC] decision in Jarkesy could kneecap enforcement by the FCC, the FTC, the NLRB, the Department of Labor, and moreโ€”it goes WAY beyond the SEC. This is a massive blow to the federal government’s ability to enforce regulations against lawbreakers.”

    so much for hoping the

    “D”NC & corporate

    ‘centrist’ Dems’d

    pull our asses

    outta the

    Morass.

    @21 fuck-

    ing Bingo.

  16. Kind of ironic that TS continues to try to support Trump by bashing Biden while simultaneously complaining about the rulings by Trumpโ€™s justices.

  17. @23: โ€œPeople are using the English language to express their feelings about an ongoing humanitarian crisis,โ€

    Whether a writer thousands of miles from the scene โ€œfeelsโ€ there is genocide happening has no impact of any kind whatsoever on whether genocide is actually happening there or not. Again, is it entirely unreasonable to ask writers to know the definitions of words they use, and use only the words they know?

    โ€œโ€ฆsome of the UNโ€™s genocide criteria are applicable to Israelโ€™s efforts in Gaza.โ€

    If you read the except I provided, youโ€™ll see it requires intent. Thereโ€™s no doubt Hamas had the intent of killing Jews, for being Jews, on land Hamas has declared it will make free of Jews. Yet, strangely, writers here have seemed reluctant to use the word โ€œgenocideโ€ to describe Hamasโ€™ acts on 10/7 and after (e.g. launching rockets into Israel from Rafah).

    On the other hand, Israelโ€™s intent to kill Palestinian civilians does not seem as obvious, given Hamasโ€™ long-documented record of shooting at the IDF and Israel from behind those civilians. Yet that uncertainty concerning intent does not seem to have restrained writers here from using the word โ€œgenocideโ€ constantly to describe the IDFโ€™s actions. It seems there is either a lot of confusion about what the word means, or the use is dishonest. Either way, thatโ€™s an argument against continued use of it.

    โ€œโ€ฆbut teetering on the brink of a meltdown appears to be your resting state.โ€

    It would not be the first time here you have misinterpreted what I wrote, now would it?

  18. @27, Are you trying to tell me that you actually care deeply about the plight of Palestinians in Gaza even though your โ€œvolume of rageโ€ has been on mute this whole time and dialed up to 11 for the opposing view?

    All we have to go by are the actual words people use to express their opinions. If youโ€™re concerned about the same things as I am you have to say so, because everything youโ€™re actively communicating is that you donโ€™t care about those issues at all. Not that my comment was even addressed to you.

  19. @30, Youโ€™re completely unhinged and you bring the same manic energy to every topic you discuss. Thatโ€™s my opinion based on the various comments of yours Iโ€™ve skimmed over, and if Iโ€™ve ever misconstrued you itโ€™s only because there is no way Iโ€™m reading all that. Iโ€™ll sleep great tonight knowing I donโ€™t agree with you about this or nearly anything else.

  20. @18 The party machine has to promote other politicians before they become more than hypothetical. Everyone falling in line behind the incumbent way before the contest while claiming that anyone else offering an alternative is some kind of traitor secretly working for the opposition will not result in any factual better suited alternative. I don’t understand the logic of claiming that a vigorous challenge promotes division and failure. On the contrary, challenging the incumbent is a sign of vibrancy and renewal that mobilizes diverse viewpoints and makes coalitions possible. Democrats are sending vibes of sclerosis around the status quo, not vibrancy. Trump is way worse but when people are desperate for change they are ready to blow up anything.

  21. I used to visit Slog every weekday but I finally gave up earlier this year. Came back just to say Fuck the Stranger and their tiktok fueled agenda. Fucking entitled shits can fuck right off.

  22. @29 Your misgivings are duly noted. Personally I regard Trump (and his impenetrable personality cult) as posing such a unique danger to the world that I would welcome his replacement on the ticket by Haley, even if political analysts think she’d be more likely to win. I disagree with her on almost everything but I’m fairly confident she at least won’t blow up NATO, start a global trade war the U.S. would badly lose, destroy what’s left of the domestic social fabric trying to deport millions of deeply rooted undocumented immigrants, or mount a coup to overturn the election if she loses. And as for Biden holding the Democratic coalition together, that was arguably true up until late last year. He’s now lost a major part of the progressive vote, perhaps for good, over Gaza and his border crackdown. More broadly, he’s also weighed down by the widespread perception (whatever the reality) that the rates of inflation and violent crime are still unacceptably high and rising.

    Yes, a contested convention poses risks, but right now Biden is on a glide path to defeat. That’s just the reality. Something has to be done to fundamentally reset the terms of this race, and if he can’t get his numbers up convincingly by late August, I think asking him to step aside is a risk worth taking. This election is far too important for Democrats to obediently follow Biden off a cliff just because he’s the incumbent.

  23. The time to deny Biden the nomination was prior to the various caucuses and primaries months and months ago – that didnโ€™t happen. The fantasy that the delegates are going to deny Biden his nomination (after all of those victories) needs to end.

    If zealots like Xina want to scream burn it down (albeit more like BURN IT DOWN!!!!), so be it – it wonโ€™t change the reality that a president represents a party, and Progressives are far better off under a Democratic presidency than a Republican presidency (regardless of who that president is). Any argument to the contrary is delusional.

  24. when the “D”NC

    shoved out Bernie

    Hillary told Bernie’s

    Supporters to STFU

    & Vote for Her ’cause

    where Else were we gonna

    Fucking GO? let’s hope smokin’

    Joe can see and reads the Writing

    on the fucking Wall and steps Aside

    ‘Centrists”re Still

    Angry over RBG blaming

    her for Obama’s failure to

    appoint a lefty . yet’re silent

    when it comes to geriatric joe

    except to claim

    It’s Not Genocide

    yet.

    if only

    we might

    Vote ‘meh.’

  25. Eltrumpfster

    doesn’t like staring

    silently into the camera

    his bankrupt eyes’re

    as Shifty as his

    manner

    & Olde Joe

    ain’t lookin’

    any younger

    but it’s

    Early

  26. @2

    The court rendered a decision based on aprocedural matter and NOT the substance of Idaho’s all encompassing abortion ban. In other words, they kicked the can down the road until after the election.

    Which has apparently conned a lot of people without legal knowledge. Or they’re simply being dishonest about what the court actually decided.

  27. This is going poorly and Ckathes is correct. If Joe were to step aside next week the DNC could absolutely facilitate a fellow moderate’s stepping in to pick up the torch in his stead. There are dozens of qualified candidates out there, and modern day news cycles are such that any one of them could blitz the media and talk show circuits for the next month to have a viable platform out there for consumption, proliferation and support. Any one of them would be freaking eviscerating this shithead tonight.

    I’ll reiterate that I thought his first term went as well as could possibly have been expected, given all the constraints he was saddled with. But we’ve watched him deteriorating both physically and cognitively in real time, and if he loses this election it’s entirely on him and those in his immediate orbit that enabled the reelection campaign.

  28. @38 “Progressives are far better off under a Democratic presidency than a Republican presidency”

    Exactly, which is why progressives and everyone else to the left of Romney should hope to hell someone at the DNC convinces Biden to step aside and let someone who can actually win (ie any Dem who can complete a sentence) take over. But they won’t, and we’ll all suffer the consequences.

  29. nyt:

    Bidenโ€™s Strug-

    gles in Debate

    Alarm Democrats

    Shaky Performance

    Against Trump Re-

    inforces Doubts

    President Biden

    hoped to build fresh mo-

    mentum for his re-election bid

    against Donald Trump. Instead, he

    prompted a wave of panic in his party.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/biden-debate-democrats.html

    and

    A Fumbling Performance,

    and a Panicking Party

    President Bidenโ€™s shaky, halt-

    ing debate performance has

    Democrats talking about

    replacing him on

    the ticket.

    the commentariats

    are eviscerating Smokin’

    Joes decision to stick around

    and rightfully so.

  30. those who scream the Loudest

    “JOE MUST STAY — HE’S

    OUR ONLIEST HOPE!

    are they

    secretly Eltrumpfster

    Supporters? at This stage

    is seems quite

    Likely.

    you gotta

    Step Down

    Joe. you did

    Great but Father

    Time Waits for No One.

    for fucks sake

    remember RBG?

  31. from The New Republic:

    Ditch Biden. That

    Debate Perform-

    ance Was a

    Disaster.

    Joe Bidenโ€™s job

    at Thursdayโ€™s debate should

    have been easy. He failed on every level.

    This is a debate that can and should lead Democrats to ask serious and complicated questions. Biden had one job here, and it shouldnโ€™t have been hard. He had to convince voters that he could clear the lowest bar in American history: that he is more capable of leading and governing than Donald Trump.

    He not only failed to clear it, he made Trump seem reasonable and coherent by comparison. The questions facing the party will be logistically complex, but they shouldnโ€™t be emotionally difficult.

    Joe Biden is losing this election. He has been for months. And for months, we have been told by his defenders that once we get a split-screen moment with Donald Trump, that will all change: Voters will be reminded of the disaster that Trump is and the existential risk that he poses to the country itself.

    We just had that split-screen moment. Biden not only failed to make the case that he is capable of beating Donald Trump, he failed to make the case that he is capable of leading for another four years.

    Democrats are panicking, and they are right to. This was a disaster, from start to finish. Unless something is done, it could have catastrophic consequences.

    –by Alex Shephard

    more:

    https://newrepublic.com/article/183242/joe-biden-debate-performance-disaster-trump

  32. @51

    there’s

    Massive

    Difference

    ‘twixt supporting

    Israel & supporting

    Israel’s reich-wing Zealots

    currently genociding their way

    to a Massive — ILLEGAL — Land Grab

    can You

    make that

    distinction?

    will “our”

    Corporate-

    Owned Media

    make that distinction?

    they OWN the

    fucking Magaphone

    and as we all* know

    Propaganda fuck-

    ing WORKS.

    *well

    Not the

    Dunning/

    Krogers. duh

  33. @53 the obvious answer, although she’s also a weak candidate, is for Biden to step aside and name his VP his successor. It should not be a contest between multiple candidates in any event

  34. @56

    “Youโ€™ve been

    pretty adamant

    that anyone who

    supports sweeps is

    as horrible as a MAGA… “

    no, I don’t believe I’ve made

    that comparison – perhaps

    you might refresh my

    memory?

    a Sheldon Whitehouse

    or a Gretchen Whitman’d

    shred Eltrumpfster in a heartbeat

    as might a number

    of Dems — but with the

    “D”NC in fucking Charge*

    all bets’re Off. do They prefer

    another Disastrous trumpf rerun

    surely more devastating than before?

    *they fucking gave us

    Joe & Hillary

    FFS.

  35. @57,

    That certainly is the obvious route. Not sure it’s correct though, as you note she’s a weak candidate and actually polls even worse than Joe. I think I’d also prefer a clean break from this administration at this point, though I’ve no idea who I’d prefer see propped up. A few months ago I made the case for Cory Booker on one of these threads and I still think he’d be worthy of strong consideration.

  36. @50: โ€œthe commentariats

    are eviscerating Smokin’

    Joes decision to stick aroundโ€

    Do tell us

    How eight months

    Of your commentary copypasta

    From the New York Times

    Has caused any change

    In Israelโ€™s actions

    Against Hamas

    In Gaza.

    Please

    feel

    Free

    To

    Start

    Any

    Time

    Thx!

  37. speaking of Must See TeeVee

    & Jon Stewart (thanks, Mike!)

    nyt:

    Jon Stewart

    Is a Little Stressed

    Out About That Debate

    Hosting a live โ€œDaily Showโ€ after

    the Biden-Trump spectacle,

    Stewart said he needed

    โ€œto call a real estate

    agent in New

    Zealand.โ€

    oodles More:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/arts/television/jon-stewart-debate-trump-biden.html

    thee best readerโ€™s

    comment on the

    article:

    why has no one declared this to be the best thing the democratic party could have done by having biden debate trump on a public stage this early in the election cycle?

    surely his aides and inner circle knew exactly what they were dealing with: a man of diminished faculties in his 81st year. and if they were unable to convince him to step down for the good of the country then maybe it would take the voice of the electorate to make that point forcefully enough.

    thank you democratic party for making it clear, however painful the process might have been, that a new voice is needed at the top of the democratic ticket.

    –riotta rigotta; manitoba

    more:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/arts/television/jon-stewart-debate-trump-biden.html#commentsContainer

Comments are closed.