Both of the candidates in this race are well qualified and have good intentions, but the incumbent, Laurel Gibson, deserves to keep her seat. Appointed to the court this spring, Gibson has been rated “well qualified” or “exceptionally well qualified” by six legal groups across the state. She’s worked as a public defender, administrative law judge, and advocate for people with disabilities, and she’s racked up endorsements from district court, municipal court, and superior court judges. She’s promising to use her knowledge and connections in the social-service world to help defendants get access to treatment and other needed services. Gibson’s opponent, Brian Todd, calls her a “public safety disaster,” but can’t back up that claim. He has less relevant experience, fewer endorsements, and no campaign contributions. Vote Gibson.
