The patriot game lame, amirite? Credit: Chris Bennion

In her program notes on The Lieutenant of Inishmore, by Anglo-Irish playwright Martin McDonagh, local playwright Stephanie Timm writes that “its characters cover every surfacewith blood until nothing and no one is left pure or unstained.”

If only that were true.

By the end of McDonagh’s gallows-comedy masterpiece about violent Irish hicks, the only thing defiled and stained is the script. The set holds four corpses (five, if you count the cat), genteel little pools of blood, and demure spatters of gore on the walls. The production not only fails to cover every surface with blood, it fails to get elbow-deep in the disturbing guts of McDonagh’s hideously funny script, in which the playwright turns a blast furnace on rural radicals in Ireland—and, by extension, people and paramilitaries in poor places around the world. Instead of playing it straight and finding the comedy in real people trying to negotiate real mayhem, director Kurt Beattie has turned Inishmore into a light, neutered farce. Its paramilitary terrorists, who should be fucking terrifying—they can’t give the play any stakes unless they’re terrifying—are no scarier and no more revelatory than the Keystone Cops.

The first scene is good enough: A young, bug-eyed moron named Davey (MJ Sieber) walks into a rustic cottage holding a dead cat in his arms. Davey shows it to drunk old Donny (Seán G. Griffin), who freaks out. The dead cat belongs to his son “Mad Padraic” (Jeffrey Fracé), a torturer and assassin who was rejected by the IRA for being “too mad.” Padraic, his father tells us, is going to demand several pounds of flesh in exchange for the dead cat, which was his only friend in the world. “Didn’t he outright cripple the poor fella laughed at that girly scarf he used to wear?” Davey asks apprehensively. “And that was when he was 12?!” “His first cousin, too, that fella was,” Donny says, “nivver minding 12! And then pinched his wheelchair!”

The second scene shows Mad Padraic in action—torturing a trussed-up drug dealer—when he learns that his cat is not well. Then he freaks out. This is McDonagh’s first chance to scare us, to take us by the hand and yank us down the dark, bloody road in his mind. But director Beattie abandons that road for a lighter, more frivolous one, letting his characters mug and caper like they’re in an Irish minstrel show. (Sieber, as Davey, is the worst offender, blowing out his cheeks and galumphing about the set like a cartoon.) These zanies, including three assassins from the INLA (Irish National Liberation Army) who show up at Padraic’s home, don’t seem capable of throwing a punch, much less torturing each other with cheese graters and hot irons.

The one exception is Elise Hunt as Mairead, a small-town girl with an air rifle who dreams of joining the Irish revolutionaries. She, at least, seems to regard her character as a real human being with passions, flaws, and a center of gravity, instead of as a hollow buffoon. (Mairead has decorated her air rifle with sparkly girly stickers—the perfect metaphor for her combination of girlishness and violent idealism.) To function, Inishmore must terrorize its audience: The killers must be killers and its violence must feel threatening. This exchange, for example, in which Padraic is behind his dad, Donny (who is bound, kneeling on the floor), and the three INLA members burst in and draw their guns on him.

Padraic: You wouldn’t be killing a fella in front of his dad, would ya?

Brendan: You’re behind your dad.

Padraic: It’s the principle I’m saying, ya thick, Brendan.

Brendan: Oh, the principle.

Padraic: Dad, you wouldn’t want to see me killed in front of you, would ya? Wouldn’t it be a trauma?

Donny: I couldn’t give a feck! Weren’t you about to shoot me in the fecking head, sure?

If the audience isn’t at least a little afraid that any of those guns could go off at any time, the scene loses its tension and its comedy. These men are idiots, to be sure, but they must be frightening idiots, who inadvertently mock themselves with McDonagh’s satire, wit, and bank-shot subversion. Barring Hunt, nobody in this production (least of all director Beattie) seems to believe that. It’s as if they condescended to the material—Look at these stupid, droll brutes! Aren’t their silly antics so diverting!—instead of putting their shoulders into it.

A mountain of small technical choices serve as evidence of this fundamental misunderstanding: The gunshots sound like cartoon gunfire, played over the theater’s speakers, instead of coming from blanks fired onstage. (If we don’t fear the gunfire, the guns cannot be scary.) All these hicks’ shoes (Dr. Martens, Converse, boots) are shockingly pristine, as if everyone had just gotten back from the mall instead of mucking around the most punishing, desolate countryside in Ireland. Perhaps most egregiously, the set is embellished with stones sparkling with green glitter. Green glitter. As if this were a diorama at Epcot fucking Center. An audience cannot possibly feel the slightest fear of violence in such an environment—which means the play cannot do its work.

It’s a damn shame. An embarrassment, really. Producing a half-assed McDonagh is like publishing a bowdlerized Baudelaire or rerecording Pogues songs as elevator music: You could do it, you could amuse a few dullards while doing it, and you might even make some money while doing it.

But why would you bother?

Last weekend, a small, new theater company called Boom! achieved what ACT and Beattie failed to do: mount a moving, funny, occasionally terrifying play about real people reacting to real mayhem. You enter Taphonomy through a damp doorway beneath the Alaskan Way Viaduct—just a few steps from people reeking of cheap booze, huddling under filthy wool blankets—accompanied by a stern-looking pair in military fatigues, carrying rifles. The walls of the small theater are covered in ominous graffiti—”safe house 5 mi.,” “you have to expect setbacks”— while a tall figure in a gas mask looms in the corner.

Performed in short scenes that interrupt each other with the speed of a film instead of a play, Taphonomy (the title refers to the study of decomposition) posits a “zombie infection” that erupted 25 years ago and has turned America into Armageddon. Rogue marines fight their way from abandoned building to abandoned building, trying to stay alive. Isolated scientists work in makeshift labs, trying to understand zombie metabolism and develop a vaccine for the disease. An aristocracy of people hides underground the way nobles hid in an abbey in Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death.” Kids form street gangs that fight the zombies and each other. Instead of focusing on zombie-movie clichés, the production honestly wonders what it’d be like to live in a world under siege. People fight over access to food and drugs, negotiate shifting alliances, forget their history (one character references Christ and another asks, “Who’s that?”), wonder about their attackers (“Do zombies have thoughts?” “Do zombies poop?”), betray each other, do kindnesses for each other, and occasionally have to shoot each other if someone gets infected with the zombie disease—in other words, they behave like real human beings reacting to real mayhem.

The company uses the creepy warren of its building to maximum effect, slamming doors and walls, moaning loudly from a distance, letting the sounds drift through layers of Sheetrock and wood. When their violence runs into technical limitations, they use blackouts and flashlights to let our imaginations do what their budget cannot. A few of the characters are goofily overwritten—a guy from New Jersey curses Pagliacci pizza (we’ve forgotten Christ but we remember Pagliacci?) and a researcher shouts “Eureka!” in a nerdy, nasal whine.

But these wrinkles are intermittent and small in light of what Boom! achieved last weekend. They created a truly harrowing gallows comedy out of whole cloth while ACT squandered an established gallows-comedy masterpiece.

Unfortunately, Taphonomy closed this week. Let’s hope for a remount someday. recommended

Brend an Kiley has worked as a child actor in New Orleans, as a member of the junior press corps at the 1988 Republican National Convention, and, for one happy April, as a bootlegger’s assistant in Nicaragua....

15 replies on “More Guts, Please”

  1. Couldn’t agree more about Inishmore. It looks like they were afraid to lose subscribers, so opted to keep things as light as possible under the circumstances. Sean Griffin was the only performer who seemed to be able to find what was funny in the script without losing the stakes. Maybe Hunt was having an off night when I saw it, but I’d count her in with the rest of the cast–nothing there to make anyone uncomfortable. A big disappointment. I don’t know what ACT’s other McDonagh productions were like–I had hopes that they’d prepared their subscribers with the other plays, but perhaps they softened those as well.

  2. ACT performed “Lieutenant” as vaudeville, as an entertainment unto itself, without any regard for the underlying tragedy: a horrible civil war. Portraying the Troubles as a yuck-fest was borderline offensive. The satire in McDonagh’s text was completely disrespected.

    In a commentary attached to the Stranger’s ACT page I discuss the problem of less-than-convincing stage gore, a variation of the Uncanny Valley problem in CGI. This is a big problem and it’s getting worse. Too many stage directors are undermining the theatrical experience by misusing their bag of tricks.

  3. I’ve agreed at least 90% with Brendan’s two recent reviews (“Inishmore” and “Carnage”). Maybe the directors of these two productions should have exchanged scripts. Wilson Milam who helmed “Carnage” directed “Inishmore” on Broadway where it garnered glowing reviews.

  4. Dear Brendan,
    Thanks for trying, and I realize you’re understaffed, but your theater section is essentially worthless, worse than worthless actually because you consistently review plays too late in their runs for people to go. If you’d like to be a useful theater section, please review plays as real theater reviewers do — during previews or opening weekends — when those reviews might be useful to would-be theater goers. When you write a review, as you have above, about a play about to close or which — absurdly! — already has, you might just as well headline it, “Haha, I got to see this play and you didn’t. Suck it assholes!” which is not, you know, the job of a theater reviewer. Review in a timely fashion or don’t review at all. You are hurting the newspaper, and you are hurting the theater scene.

  5. @7: It is disappointing to find that the play Taphonomy had already closed. However, far from hurting the “theater scene”, making sure he calls out good work when he sees it is a good way of letting people know to watch out for the *next* work from this group. That’s far from worthless; it’s *essential* for the theater scene. I do agree, though, that it would have been nice for Brendan to have posted something on Slog immediately after seeing the play. Maybe he did, and I just missed it.

  6. ACT’s production of Martin McDonagh’s “A Skull in Connemara” several years ago was brilliant. (The director eventually went on to direct another production of it in New York.) Their work on his “Pillowman” a few years later…not so much. And Brendan is right on the money this time around: “Lieutenant” was a big messy disappointment. Watching actors “play drunk” can be painful, and the usually reliable MJ Sieber was embarrassing. The violence and gore were far too jokey. I’ve never seen another production of “Lieutenant of Inishmore,” but from a friend’s detailed description of the New York production, yeah, it sounds like ACT really muted everything, not just the gun-shots.

  7. Blanks are potentially fatal up to 20 feet. In a production with this much gunfire it was wise not to use them. I agree that the show didn’t delve into it’s darkside as it should have. Elise Hunt was meh and totally miscast.

  8. @ 7. Sorry about the tardy Taphonomy review. I wasn’t planning to see it (so much to see!), but kept hearing about it and thought it’d be better to see and let people know what happened (and possibly get excited by this new company) than not see it at all. Less than ideal, I know. But I do what I can.

    And criticism isn’t always prescriptive. It’s also archival. That’s why we keep reading Parker and Tynan and the rest (or least why I do).

  9. You are right on the money Brendan.

    It truly felt like they were trying to keep everyone happy; give the young folks cursing and violence, but not too much so the old folks don’t get offended.

    As it turns out they didn’t make anyone happy. I, a younger person, didn’t like it, and neither did many of the older patrons. I heard couple after couple complaining as they were leaving that this was “the worst show they had ever seen at ACT.” That the whole show was just “dead cat humor.”

    It just goes to show you that you can’t please all the people all the time. And you should never try.

  10. Hmmm….I’ve tickets to ACT tonight, so we’ll see. Their production of Albee’s “The Goat” (a few years ago) is still one of the best things I’ve seen on a local stage, but apparently subscribers flipped out. I also thought ACT’s “Pillowman” was decent, but again, the seniors were unhappy. Theatre subscribers are literally dying off. But sounds like this “trying to please everyone” results only in mediocre mush. I haven’t seen a show here in 2 years, because the line-up has been so uninspired. I’ve been anticipating the McDonagh for a year now.

  11. This was eerily similar to my experience with God of Carnage. After several negative, scathing remarks about the show, I paid a cheap price to see the show and actually liked it for what it was, but could see why it angered thespians: It’s an exhibition of vast mainstage theatre resources on a throwaway comedy.

    And you were right about how soulfully great Elise Hunt was as Mairead. But I thought Jeffrey Fracé’s Padraig was a finely seething, troubled ball of vengeful rage. Yeah, the others were cartoon characters in line with Kurt Beattie’s chosen tone of a light, cartoonish black comedy, but put this Padraig in a more serious production of Inishmore and he’d fit right in with that motif.

    I liked it, but I also paid far less than the original $50 ticket price to see it. I’d have been pissed to pay $50 for this, and amidst some entertained theatregoers at the Falls Theatre, I saw some sour faces. Brendan’s not the only one who’s getting tired of disposable mainstage Seattle theatre.

Comments are closed.