In the days after the capture of Saddam Hussein from inside a
“spider hole” on December 13, 2003, reporters scrambled to go into the
hole. They couldn’t get an interview with Hussein and were in no
position to discern how the capture affected the progress and meaning
of a complicated ongoing war—especially since this war had been
waged in large part on this one man—but the hole was there to be
comprehended in full.
It was only six feet deep and had only two parts: a vertical box cut
into the ground of a backyard and a horizontal tunnel leading off the
box, large enough to fit a single man. The graphic artists of news
organizations made colored drawings based on information from the
military. Meanwhile, TV news sent journalists to climb down into the
spider hole. 60 Minutes did this. The reporter walks through a
gate into the backyard and up to the black square hole in the dirt
under a fruit tree. He steps into the hole, lowers himself, and gets
down on the dirt floor, scanning the camera in every direction. The
floor and ceiling fade in and out of view like dark, dirty water,
leaving no clear impression. The flaking concrete walls seem both
close-up and far away. The shape and size of this space are more
mysterious than ever. The opposite of clarification has just occurred.
The report ends.
Given the insolubility of big problems and mysteries, we will always
come up with a way to solve, in great detail, the very small ones. A
hole in the ground turns out to be a bonanza of abstraction and
distraction. But while reconstructing Hussein’s spider hole started out
a metaphor, it became a comedy. MSNBC built a model on its set in neat
blond plywood boxes. Anchorwoman Contessa Brewer stood in the vertical
box wearing a red jacket and pants while a retired general intoned,
“This is a hidey-hole.” She then lounged on her side in Hussein’s
tunnel spot, informing the viewer, “I’m not a grown man here; I’m a
grown woman.”
Leo Saul Berk nails all of this in a single sculpture. It is an
obscene sculpture; in fact, it is the greatest obscenity to be made in
Seattle art in years. It is bright yellow, covered in the tiny glass
beads used in road reflectors (they reflect white and frosty depending
on the way the light hits), and it reaches down from the ceiling where
it is mounted.
The shape is recognizable as the same shape as Hussein’s spider hole
and the sculpture is called Spider Hole. But the tunnel that
snakes off the entry box and comes at your face as you enter the
gallery—the same tunnel that was so ineffable on the 60
Minutes camera—is muscled, tonguelike, and unmistakably
erect. Oh, it’s effable now. “Franz West fucks Martin Puryear” is how
Lawrimore Project considered describing Spider Hole in its press
materials for the show. The only thing to add is “while Jeff Koons
watches.”
And yet this bit of yellow gigantism (and yellow journalism) is
easily identifiable as a Berk. Berk is a Seattle artist who has been
creating sparkly, brightly colored topographical doppelgängers of
actual landscapes using a CNC router (it stands for Computer Numerical
Control) for years. The machine takes up most of his studio. He was
able to buy it thanks to a commission, and he harnesses it for
sculpture and drawing rather than for its usual manufacturing purposes.
For sculptures, the machine cuts the materials, which the artist then
hand-finishes in pigmented resin and hand-sands (apparently, the
sanding is torturous). His newest exhibition consists of four major
CNC-based sculptures and four CNC drawings using sparkle pens. Each
piece maps an underground space that is connected to recent political
events: Hussein’s spider hole (the only one at full scale, which makes
its absurdity even more pointed in contrast to its exactitude); Tora
Bora, said to be the hiding place of Osama bin Laden; the Quecreek
mine, where nine miners were trapped and triumphantly rescued in summer
2002, in the same Pennsylvania county where United Flight 93 went down
less than a year before; and Naj Tunich, the ancient Mayan cave in
Guatemala that Berk happened to be wandering around inside during a
Central American vacation on September 11, 2001. (This last work,
called Rattling House, was seen at Seattle University’s Lee
Center for the Arts last year.)
The significance of the machine is its precision, in direct
contradiction to the value of the information conveyed. Berk’s solid,
exacting model sculptures facilitate beautifully the desire to project
oneself into unknown spaces for the purposes of discovery. But the
discovery instead is about the limits of projection and the elaborate
ways we ignore those limits. There is so much desire requited in
architectural models, but famously little knowledge gained, and Berk’s
stylish, dazzling colors and finishes are like cocktails that reveal
exaggerated truths and sustain pleasure at the same time. This is how
political fictions are mixed and swallowed.
Berk’s work has always been exquisitely made and often
experientially satisfying. But not until now has it also been rooted in
a series of ideas so far-reaching and clamberingly dendritic. The
largest sculpture in the show, Quecreek Mine, is a flat grid cut
from a sheet of glowing orange acrylic (several sheets, actually,
puzzle-pieced together) that maps the giant mine precisely at an
insanely reduced scale (the quarter-inch thickness of the acrylic
corresponds to the actual height of the tunnels, and the 30-by-22-foot
spread of the sculpture corresponds to its miles in length).
This true-to-life orange grid, which casts a crisp raspberry shadow
grid on the gallery floor from light passing through the transparent
acrylic, rests on boomerang-shaped U’s made of dark walnut plywood that
bring to mind spacey 1960s furniture design. It seems relevant to point
out that Berk grew up in the quite groovy (and cavelike) Ruth Ford
House by visionary architect Bruce Goff in Aurora, Illinois.
Nineteenth-century conditions meet 20th-century style and 21st-century
technology (the mine, the ’60s design, the CNC), and where have we
arrived? Inner space may as well be outer space. A little knowledge is
still the best and most dangerous thing we’ve got. ![]()

It doesn’t look like a dick. It looks like a poo.
NO FNARF IT OBVI IZ SOMETING FROM BIOLOGY OR FROM TRAVELS ABROAD. THOSE IZ ONLY THINGS U QUALIFIED TO TALK BOUT.
@1. Whatever it is, it has an ergonomic handle.
Dear Jen Graves: I was with you. I was SOOO with you. You pulled me blindly through this review and kept drawing tenuous but interesting connections and dropping fascinating cultural anecdotes but I WAS STILL WITH YOU. Fascinated and suddenly intrigued by this gigantic yellow block/turd/orifice/penis/whateverthefuck. And it felt good. And then you wrote this series of sentences: “The significance of the machine is its precision, in direct contradiction to the value of the information conveyed. Berk’s solid, exacting model sculptures facilitate beautifully the desire to project oneself into unknown spaces for the purposes of discovery. But the discovery instead is about the limits of projection and the elaborate ways we ignore those limits. There is so much desire requited in architectural models, but famously little knowledge gained, and Berk’s stylish, dazzling colors and finishes are like cocktails that reveal exaggerated truths and sustain pleasure at the same time. This is how political fictions are mixed and swallowed.” This is not the New Yorker where totally meaningless, abstruse, pompous bullshit passes as intellectualism. This is The Stranger. The obscenity of data? Excuse me? WHAT THE F%*K ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!? Unless this paragraph was the result of a simple typesetting error that erroneously transposed the paragraph you actually wrote with a personal from the !!? section of Lustlab, you owe me an apology for raping my brain.
“This true-to-life orange grid, which casts a crisp raspberry shadow grid on the gallery floor from light passing through the transparent acrylic”
It also cast a beautiful rose reflection on the ceiling.