What’s particularly perverse about the newspaper industry’s race
toward rock bottom in 2008 is the fact that it was an incredible year
for news: the Olympics, the presidential campaigns, Obama, the economic
crash, and two wars, on top of the usual crush of natural disasters and
exposed crooks, closet cases, and hypocrites. Art has stirred from its
slumber, too, with artists grabbing the world more tightly and shaking
it. These are the shows of artists whose effects I really felt this
year.

1 WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution at
Vancouver Art Gallery.
It’s tricky keeping art moral. There’s
something inherently, wonderfully amoral about art—it does nothing, really—but its stubborn independence is the same thing
that makes it our only potential way out of this whole mess, the only
moral thing we’ve got going. This huge historical exhibition, which is
the first-ever survey of feminist art from 1965 to 1980 and is up
through January 11, is not just a tribute to radically creative and
creatively radical human beings, it is something that was missing from
the world until now. It is also a tribute to people who were, and are,
right.

2 Robert Irwin: Primaries and Secondaries at
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego.
Irwin is 80 years old and
never better, and this retrospective had the double benefit of
presenting the trajectory of his work back to his earliest abstract
paintings as well as two major new installations. The show also was the
occasion for what may be the best presentation of one of Irwin’s
signature discs ever—these things veritably hang in thin air when
they’re installed right, which is seldom. Irwin is, simply put, one of
the most important artists alive. He makes you know that you and the
world in front of you may be all you have, but that’s all you need.

3 Dario Robleto at the Frye Art Museum. Robleto’s art
is made of wondrous items, things that make you believe they are not
really what the wall labels say they are: crushed human bones, the
powder of pituitary glands, woolly mammoth hairs, rain that fell
hundreds of years ago, dolls made by Civil War amputees, bullets bit by
soldiers in pain. In effect, Robleto’s is the same project as Irwin’s,
although their works and their styles could not be more different. The
point is to know that the world is both real and incredible.

4 The Gates of Paradise: Lorenzo Ghiberti’s Renaissance
Masterpiece
at Seattle Art Museum. For all the big-name,
big-ticket stuff that paraded through SAM this year (impressionists and
Old Masters, Roman sculpture from the Louvre, Edward Hopper’s women,
the long-awaited Coast Salish show), this show of just three golden
panels from the Florentine baptistery—shining in a darkened
room—was the only exhibition that was truly heavenly, truly worth
its billing as a real live star.

5 Susan Robb: The Challenge Nature Provides at Lawrimore Project. Robb is a midcareer Seattle artist whose
work is an act of devotion in the face of great discouragement. Her
subject is nothing less than the state of the natural world, but her
gestures in sculpture, installation, and video are as humble as the
tiniest movement of a piece of wire attaching otherworldly flowers to a
clump of crystals or the flying of a school of enormous garbage bags.
This was her greatest show yet.

6 Multiplex at Western Bridge. Often
what drives the shows at the private space Western Bridge are heart and
humor (deriving from the style of director Eric Fredericksen and the
taste of the collectors the Trues—this found its apex in the 2007
show Insubstantial Pageant Faded), but in this case, what we got
was breadth. A survey of the last 10 years of video-making, here in
fine form was the world of video with all its possible connections and
possibilities: glossy cinematic production (Isaac Julien), random
documentary action identified and captured as vernacular choreography
(Dara Friedman), high jinks caught on tape (Jack Daws), rapturous
painterly abstraction (Takeshi Murata). A new meaning for the word
“multiplex.”

7 This Is the Worst Trip I’ve Ever Been On:
Acculturation in a Pre-Apocalyptic Age
by Anne Mathern and
Chad Wentzel at Crawl Space.
These two best friends—each
quite the artist—made each other even better with a show about
distance, longing, separation, and translation. Sound, sculpture,
photography—whatever it took, including Wentzel and his sister
singing “Dona Nobis Pacem” over a speakerphone.

8 Don’t You F#{%ING Look at Me!: Surveillance in the
21st Century
at 911 Media Arts Center. The story of this
show is that a great idea has its own power; it doesn’t need big
budgets and fancy galleries. You even had to stand in a hallway to
watch one of the works in this little survey, in which the London
artist Manu Luksch introduced the concept of CCTV filmmaking. Because
911 Media Arts Center is so out of the way, I found myself entirely
alone in a theater, watching Gary Hill’s 2003 masterpiece Blind
Spot
, in which a man and a camera do silent battle, feeling like
the luckiest person alive.

9 Home Field Advantage by Matt Browning at
Crawl Space.
Best artist debut this year. He’s got a sense of humor
and a sense of history, and he united middle-school chalkboards,
baseball, monochrome painting, abstract expressionism, and knitting in
the space of six-by-nine inches in a single, intensely lovable object
made from the yarn of deconstructed baseballs.

10 12 Views by Claire Cowie at James Harris
Gallery.
This Seattle painter’s work has never been so exquisite or
so much about death, but in an open, white expanse of space sort of
way. There was curiosity and loss in these 12 separate paintings of
multicolored imaginary landscapes. They connected in an implied horizon
line that followed all the way around three walls of the gallery like a
19th-century panorama. And the trees: dendritic wonders. recommended

Jen Graves (The Stranger’s former arts critic) mostly writes about things you approach with your eyeballs. But she’s also a history nerd interested in anything that needs more talking about, from male...

7 replies on “Best in Shows”

  1. What is this love affair with Claire Cowie???? Please, please, I beg you, tell us what is so compelling about her work? Really. I need to understand because when I look at her tentative scratchings hanging on the wall, I always walk away scratching my head and wondering if I’m missing something.

  2. barker,

    know that the stranger is self-described “advocacy journalism”. Also know that in addition there are people in this town who make sure that certain artists are given positive attention in this paper, promoting the confidence trick that helps the money stream flow in their direction.

  3. I am someone who lives outside of WA who came across this article by accident. After reading Ms. Graves’ comments about Cowie, and then googling the show at James Harris one is left scratching ones head.

    Seeing that the primary critical comment was that Claire Cowies’ horizons were similar between pieces and that the trees were “dendritic wonders”, it does make one curious (but not in a dendritic sort of way) what it is about this work that resonates with Ms Graves. That is to say, other than nepotism.

  4. Jen, did you make it to the Louise Bourgeois show? if not, why not? if so, not in your top ten? A ground-breaker, history-maker, and she’s 97. Has a retrospective every 10 years or so, and shows NEW WORK. It’s at MOCA in LA till the 25th of January. Worth a flight just to see it. Air travel’s cheap right now.

  5. I don’t know Claire Cowie from Adam or anyone who knows her. I’ve met Jen Graves on one occasion. I occasionally write an article for the Stranger, about once a year, not about art. They pay me, but do me no favors – a movie I wrote and produced was recently called by a Stranger reviewer, “shit”. Except for once in a gallery I have only seen photos of Claire Cowie’s work but I find it very original and mysteriously captivating. I don’t know if I’d want it around all the time if I had the money to buy it, it kind of gives me the willies – but it has an undeniable originality and aliveness.

  6. Uh, why is a local art journalist for a local free weekly reviewing shows that her readers can’t go see? I don’t get that. This ain’t Art in America.

Comments are closed.