Because this is my first encounter with Heide Hinrichs’s work, this
review will be more synchronic (about the objects themselves) than
diachronic (the relations the objects have with other works, artists,
and historical periods). The encounter with Hinrichs happened in
Seattle Art Museum’s SAM Next gallery, a space dedicated to local,
national, and international contemporary art. Hinrichs is a local
artist, but she does not come from here. She was born in Germany in
1976, studied art in a number of European cities, and currently lives
in Seattle. The exhibit, called Borrowed Tails, is a
collection of drawings and sculptures made from ordinary materials:
lined paper, dead soccer and tennis balls, strings, cardboard boxes, a
table, and a bicycle tube. Together, the ordinary objects suggest a
spare or bare geography of trees, flowers, rocks, and an ocean.

With Hinrichs, the long-disused, mass-ยญproduced objects are not
so much renewed/reactivated/repurposed, but instead placed into the
tricky zone of suggestion. The objects point to something that they are
not: That something else is nature. Not long ago, Hinrichs had a
sculpture at Howard House gallery called Falling Flowers. In
reality, the sculpture was a cluster of halved and inverted soccer
balls. Some were painted pink and red. A wire held them just above the
hardwood floor. Through their ugliness, they suggested the magic and
beauty of falling flowers. Something similar to that sculpture can be
found in one of the works in Borrowed Tails. On the floor next
to the south entrance, there are two halved and inverted soccer balls
that contain orange, transparent, plastic thingsโ€”the composition
suggests tropical flowers that are heavy and ready with ripe fruit.

And now for a big statement: An artwork either suggests something
else or it draws attention to itself. For example, in the same museum,
but on the second floor, there is a parked American car. It is, true, a
part of an installation by Cai Guo-Qiang. But at this point, the end of
the installation, the car is alone and faces the traffic on First
Avenue. This is an art object because it is all about itself, or about
what it really, really isโ€”a car made in America.
Outside, the cars streaming by are lost in the processes of
transporting their occupants, of stopping and going, of passing under
the shadows of the buildings, of burning fossil fuel. The car in the
museum, which is also different from a car on display in a car
dealership (let’s leave that for another discussion), is only about the
ontological status of an automobile.

On the northeast corner of the exhibit is the most important
component of Borrowed Tails. It is the most important because
it is the most suggestive. What it suggests is the mother of all life,
the sea, and the remains of things that once lived, died, and returned
to the depths of the sea. The work is composed of a pin board whose top
has been sawed into waves and, on the floor before it, objects that
look like bonesโ€”Hinrichs calls them tools, but that is not the
immediate impression they give or suggest. From T. S. Eliot’s “The Dry
Salvages”: “The sea is the land’s edge also, the granite / Into which
it reaches, the beaches where it tosses / Its hints of earlier and
other creation: / The starfish, the horseshoe crab, the whale’s
backbone…” This is the first impression we get from these objects at
the bottom of the pin-board sea. The one that’s supposed to be a saw
looks like the jaw of some sea monster; the thing that is supposed to
be a pitchfork looks like the ossified foot of some great bird that
lived on fish. And so from the ordinary objects we get a sense of what
the historian Clive Gamble calls “deep time,” objects that are from a
time that’s so remote that they have about them an impenetrable and
unsettling otherness.

There is something else worth pointing out in this exhibit. The
objects are not that random but form something like a consistent
substrate for this spare geography. That substrate is made up of a
child’s education. The paper with the drawings of animals is from
school notebooks; the balls are from the gyms and fields of a young
person’s physical ed; the table is from a classroom that had a board
with maps, schedules, pictures of dinosaurs pinned to it. Through
Hinrichs’s careful refinement and relocation, this thin layer of a
long-ยญdisused education comes to suggest the depths of the seas and
the mystery of trees.

Charles Mudede—who writes about film, books, music, and his life in Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, the USA, and the UK for The Stranger—was born near a steel plant in Kwe Kwe, Zimbabwe. He has no memory...

8 replies on “Hints of Earlier and Other Creation”

  1. I want to know more about her living with a giant horse sculpture (without a tail) in her studio– I want to know about her traveling with a horse sculpture to mongolia, did she make any friends? what adventures ensued? This is a nice article because it lets the art stand on its own. there is a whole other dimension that would probably make an interesting film.

  2. i saw this installation and it just doesn’t work. it doesn’t do what it claims to. period. it’s just a bunch of weak ideas interrogating something benign and vague: language/poetry??? and crappy sculpture equals– uninspired, too sensitive artist trying to get away with “the gesture” which only a true genius can pull off.

    ya. not worth the admission, don’t go just for this room of poo.

  3. I think the dark drape with pendulous black orbs is hee-larious, in the most obvious prurient sense. I laughed out loud and I think startled the security guard. Being cognizant of the capacious depth of intellect of Ms. Heinrichs is the key to understanding/being moved by this install.

  4. Woops, wrong thread!

    @4

    Hi Paul,

    Iโ€™m so happy you came on board and gave thumbs up to Heide. Sheโ€™s something, isnโ€™t she? All these attacks here against her work really surprise me. I may understand their reactions to her work. When I first experienced her work my first response was what is this crap? Clearly, I didnโ€™t get it. But then I listened to her explain herself and work. It blew me away. I loved the experience of her thick German accent and apparent difficulty with our language. This surprised me too for I found that in listening to her she had, regardless, a remarkably keen sense of doing art. (That Euro centric understanding of art probably has something to teach us.) As she went on, it became clear that there was a profound sense of the contemporary art world in her and that she was not just producing amazing tongue in cheek art objects but was confronting us with something really deep but made of crap. Iโ€™m thinking sheโ€™s an art superwoman and itโ€™s easy to miss it. So much is ephemeral and so much made of junk and so much understated but ass kicking art wise. I love this woman’s art sense.

    GaryyyyyyyyFinholt

  5. @ 5

    Hi Gary. I think her lecture at SAM Remix Nov. 6 was absolutely necessary for me to dig this artist/work. Stop by the gallery and we’ll have a tete a tete. Sincerely, Paul.

  6. Maybe it was a silly impulse or maybe Iโ€™m just stuck with my personality and how my mouth uses words but Iโ€™ve become a little self-conscious about using โ€˜crapโ€™ to describe the quality of the items Heide distributes spatially in her works. I meant well but there might be better choices even beyond โ€˜junkโ€™ like cultural detritus, found vernacular pieces of things often overlooked, ordinary trashy portions of life, etc. I meant to revere her not to trash her wonderful physical objects that puzzle the mind in superb ways and search for transcendental linguistic otherness. This is very smart art and I bow to it deeply. At least that’s my point of view even if not important.

  7. Juxtaposing the pin-board sea with the Eliot quote has made me think of this installation differently–at least that part of it.

    That sea is tiny compared to the rest of the installation’s “other creation.” Depending on which we way you enter the exhibit changes how that sea could affect your experience of Hinrichs’s piece (the pieces held in a room).

    But, point being, this review makes me want to revisit the work.

Comments are closed.