The five-foot-tall, saturated colored-pencil drawings on the back
wall at Crawl Space are arresting. In glowing,
electric-gem
colors—the kind you see in photographs of Tokyo—they depict
every last element of tourist kitsch pertaining to Native Americans:
eagles flying over mountains, a stand of teepees, a howling wolf
perched over a night view of Interstate 5 and the silhouetted Seattle
skyline, flitting butterflies, feathers, a laughing baby, sparkling
galaxies, mandalas, a blue-eyed buffalo, a big-haired and beautiful
woman’s face appearing on the surface of the moon, a man wearing a wolf
pelt as a hood. (In fact, all of that is in a single one of the
drawings.)
This is not a joke.
The artist’s name is Dorian Dyer, and these works, selected for the
group show Call and Response curated by the artist Jeffry
Mitchell, were executed with evident care. Their appeal is not
inconsequential. In fact, they are sympathetic evidence of a deeply
felt spiritual quest. Sure, Dyer’s vision of nativist utopia can be
seen as problematic in a hundred different ways, and probably provides
to a certain segment of the population more ironic material than a
suburban thrift store, but so what? There’s something more here, too: a
feeling of dissatisfaction, a longing for the synthesis between ancient
and modern, a desire for (let’s say) a dream catcher to actually mean
something that maybe it doesn’t quite mean to him yet. This unfaked new
spirituality is exactly what Mitchell’s own work, delighting in
messiness, has always been about. It has to do with re-forming the
discarded, rechristening empty forms by just believing in them again,
in the process restarting the soul itself. Can it work? Or do we just
end up with a bunch of new old crap with feathers?
In Lewis Hyde’s book The Gift, he describes art as a gift,
and a gift as something better understood by precapitalist societies.
“The Indian giver (or the original one, at any rate) understood a
cardinal property of the gift: whatever we have been given is supposed
to be given away again, not kept… The only
essential is this:
the gift must always move.”
Hoarding is death for a gift. The question is how to keep art moving
in addition to or beyond or in spite of its purchase. A few futures are
proposed in the Crawl Space show. Dyer’s works (displayed with poems)
are paired with paint-and-wax collages with feathers by Jamey Braden.
Braden’s pieces are small, lovable, concentrated amulets of anxious
humor with titles like Horses Are Birds if That Is Going to Help You
Out (Yes It Will). Braden’s neofeathers approach is the opposite of
Dyer’s: She ridicules her (no less real) wish to be sheltered in old
forms.
Paradoxically, Dyer sees his works as so precious that he puts a
$21,000 price tag on each of them. This quick translation of native
spirituality into a pile of money is a betrayal of the gift culture
both of art and of tribal living, but there’s another paradox,
too—the high price keeps the works from being purchased!
Meanwhile, Braden is refusing to sell any of her four works in the show
because she cannot part with them. It’s a sign of the purity of her
intentions in making the works, which really are functioning as amulets
for her in some way. But it also amounts to hoarding.
But influence is another form of sharing, and Call and
Response is a tight universe of warmly shared concerns, a little
utopia of its own despite marked differences between the paintings,
collages, staged photographs, performance, and installed sculptures. On
opening night, Gretchen Bennett and 11-year-old Joshua Lindenmayer made
a performance of applying temporary tattoos to order on guests. Some of
their sketches remain on the wall, and you can almost hear them calling
out to Matt Cox’s white pedestals with nothing on them, one leaning on
the wall slightly and the other floating a slender quarter of an inch
above the ground. Sol Hashemi’s ingenious transformation of the banal
into the cosmic—photographs of upside-down stacks of stools,
their white seats like atoms or planets, their round white feet like
orbiting matter—is in a tug-of-war with Jack Ryan’s ingenious
transformation of the cosmic into the banal. Ryan’s photograph of the
moon encircled by a white neon tube turns the moon into sleek home
decor.
At the Helm Gallery in Tacoma, another show of a group of
artists—Gretchen Bennett, Jenny Heishman, Heide Hinrichs, and
Matthew Offenbacher, working so closely together, even sharing
materials, that they are loath to call theirs a group show—leans
on ancient bedrock. This time, though, ideas of nativeness are called
upon in the generational sense, to represent every past from which the
artists are alienated and with which they long to reunite in order to
move forward into a new (possibly impossible) independence. “We are the
second peoples. We inhabit a landscape of iteration, reverb, elision,
and generational noise,” their statement reads. Second Peoples,
the title of the show, refers to the universal dilemma of “being born
into a world that already exists,” as artist Corin Hewitt put it to me
recently. (Hewitt has an exquisitely tender show of photographs at
Seattle Art Museum now.)
Blowing past referentiality into a new future integrated with the
past—this is what David Foster Wallace meant when he urged his
generation to drive beyond ultimately despair-inducing irony. The idea
is to do more than appropriate, to use but not use up, to keep the gift
moving. Offenbacher plays a piece of carpet padding against an abstract
painting. The padding hangs on the wall, like a piece of art; the
painting sits on the floor, like a scrap of something. They share the
same color scheme and mosaic appearance, which pleasantly undermines
them both. While the abstract painting comes down to earth, the
mass-produced padding seems to achieve the spiritual: They laugh at
(and with) each other. (Bonus: The colors in the painting seem to hover
on the surface because Offenbacher’s canvas is not canvas but fabric
treated with Stainguard—i.e., the painting treats its own paint
like a stain it doesn’t want.) Across the room, Heishman sets a piece
of tinfoil on fire by decorating it with mirrored stickers and hanging
it perpendicular to a piece of fabric the blazing colors of a sunset.
Maybe the best evidence of an updated sublime is the undying desire for
it. At the very least, artists are banding together to work on this
knot of riddles for you. ![]()

Jen, your use of Hyde’s book to talk about these artworks’ new post-ironic relationship with the past really cracked those shows open for me. This is truly the best art criticism; it works with the artworks to create meanings and implications for the art’s audience. Thank you for your fine work! Saving this one on the good ol’ desktop!
Dorian Dyer’s website blows my mind a little: http://www.visionheartart.com
Well hey, the picture featured here ”Joy Embraces All”
was a 12 year project with over a thousand hours in the making,
and the other picture I had in the show, “Sacred Shield”,
which you can see on my website ”visionheartart.com”,
was 4 years in the making with about 600 hours into it.
Both are 40″ x 60″.
So I hope this put the prices I am asking for them in perspective.
My time is worth something to me.
No apologies
Dorian