It was not easy finding this house. It’s in the middle of so many
things. Here, farm animals are bred, malls are built, and new
ranch-style homes are surrounded by old trees. A grid does exist, but
not all of it has made the transition from plan to reality. Some
streets start and end wildly with birds and bushes. Whole sections of
94th Avenue East, for example, are still in a state of nature. Yet
other areas are as concrete as any place you will find at the center of
Tacoma or Seattle. This is the in-between city or, to use the words of
Thomas Sieverts, as translated from the German by Diana George in a new
book edited by Matthew Stadler, this is “where we live now.” Meaning, a
landscape “that is neither city nor country but has the characteristics
of both.”
Here in the middle of everything, it is most fitting to find at the
end of a paved stretch of 94th Avenue East a house that’s made to look
like Mount Rainier. When I finally spotted the house on a cloudy
Saturday afternoon, it was like seeing something magical take shape in
a forest. It’s not out of placeโin fact it’s about this place,
Puyallupโbut it certainly stands out. Designed by its occupant,
Ko Sugeng Wibowo, an Indonesian-
born, Tacoma-based architect (he
works for McGranahan Architects), the three-story house dominates its
one-acre lot. So huge, so silver, and so similar in profile to Rainier,
what it captures is not so much the real volcano but the idea of it. If
Plato’s forms were to exist, this would be the form from which the
popular volcano got its shape rather than the other way around.
The mountain house is framed in wood with corrugated metal siding.
Inside, what catches the eye immediately is a staircase that’s painted
almost the same red we find in that strange (might I say difficult)
section of Koolhaas’s Central Library. But whereas the one in the
library lands us inside of a menstrual cycle, this red set of stairs
lands us inside the volcano’s core. The floors are covered by a thin
layer of concrete. The first two levels have a system of tracked
curtains that wrap around the stairs. There is little clutter in the
house, lots of space, and the rooms are lit by thin and recessed
fluorescent strip lights that are cheap and practical. The windows are
in various sizes and appear in seemingly random locationsโthey
represent the black crevices of the mountain. The top floor is a room
of ice. It’s white and has windows that cannot see the very thing that
the house represents: Rainier. Indeed, none of the windows in the
mountain house holds a view of the tree-obscured mountain, which is
only 50 miles away.
The genius of the mountain house is that at no point does Wibowo’s
design abandon modernist principles. Though it represents nature, the
thinking that went into it is unexpectedly rational. The shape of the
craggy cap, for example, looks crude but is in fact composed of
identical parts. The wildness is an illusion. Also, the home’s
complexity as a whole is an illusion. Wibowo worked with a limited
budget and intentionally enlisted standard, not specialized, carpenters
who worked with simple instructions; he prided himself on the modesty
of the process and the materials. So, here we have the point at which
modernist ideals meet basic labor, geology meets design, and the urban
meets the country. What a wonderful place to be. The middle of
things.
Let’s leave Puyallup and, as if on a witch’s broomstick, fly to a
neighborhood at the center of the sprawling metropolis, the Central
District, and land on the top of a new three-story live/work loft
project on 23rd Avenue. Designed by one of the founders of Pb
Elemental, Chris Pardo, this development, which has a wonderful view of
downtown, applies the modernist program to its native situation, the
urban situation. The three units (one in the front, two in the rear)
make the most of a small lot that’s between a convenience store and HUD
housing, and are united in their urbane boxiness. Each unit has an
interior that smoothly alternates between light and heavy materials.
And from the outside, cedar panels soften the tops and concrete grounds
the base.
All very well and good. On the south wall, however, we find a
curious arrangement. Beneath a large bright orange (they call it Pb
Orange) surface is a mural by local graffiti artist John Osgood. The
reason it is there is because a clear concrete surface at ground level
presented an impossible temptation for the area’s many graffiti heads.
To dissolve this temptation, Pb Elemental hired Osgood to cover the
wall with his own graffiti. In short, the graffiti is not real but a
response to the urban environment. In fact, next to the driveway that
leads to the units in the back you’ll find real graffiti. Not
surprisingly, the real graffiti is not as good as the fake.
The mountain house has its opposite in Pb’s wall of graffiti. One is
adapting to the natural, the other to the urban. But they bring to mind
another wall shown to me many years ago by the architect Jerry Garcia.
This wall was near the intersection of Rainier Avenue South and Jackson
Street and next to the ugly Rainier Center. It was thickly covered with
leafy vines. The wall was totally green. And on the day it was shown to
me, some graffiti was on the vinesโgraffiti on a green wall,
street art on nature. This is the point where the mountain house and
the development on 23rd
Avenue meet in my mind. ![]()

John Osgood is the man…please check him out at http://www.bherdclothing.com/Art_gallery…
please make more analytical comments about my hideous hometown puyallup. please!!!
Osgoods work is horrible. serisouly, look at anyone doing urban art, he’s a joke.
The difference still remains. Pb’s work is growing old because they keep doing the same thing over and over. A few years ago they were as original as hibowo. It’s too bad he’s not doing projects in the city.
Goddamnit you piss me off! You’re always doing what Henry James cautions us against: You tell, but you don’t show. You tell us that plato said this or that, but you don’t trust your own vocabulary to say the same thing, or something new. Everyone says your(sic) such a wonderful writer with all of your “immediacy of a hard cock” crap, but I’m one person who thinks your(sic) a flat out liberal arts spewing douche rubric. I wish you’d take your liberal arts education, your quick-gloss readings of translated french philosophy, and throw them in the trash. Start from Zero, write from zero, or shut up.
With that out of the way, there’s a story in the new New Yorker that I’m assigning you for homework. It’s “Gangsters”, by Colson Whitehead. YOU should read it.
STG you’re a pathetic little man. Opinions are like… You should just enjoy the fact the wall doesn’t reflect the often drab skies of Seattle. Osgood’s a talented artist. The time and thought which goes into an undertaking like the one he produced should be appreciated. Don’t be an angry little 13 year-old because you don’t have the balls to put yourself out there other than some scribbled tag on a porta-potty. Osgood’s stuff rivals the street art is see everyday in NYC. And to the author…please don’t be ignorant or dismissive enough to decern between “real” and “fake” graffiti. Street art comes from comes from the heart and soul regardless of permission.
R&H ‘decern’ discredits your point.
So plip, should we also discredit your comment since you misspelled the persons post name?
whatever, mmp–