Guess whose dirty pictures just surfaced?
TheDirty.com Exclusive: Self-proclaimed bible thumper Miss California, Carrie Prejean, should start pointing the finger at herself for her own indiscretions. TheDirty.com has received exclusive images of the homophobic debutante that would clearly strip her of her Miss California crown. So much for being a good role model for the state of California, Carrie.
What was Miss California saying about the way she was raised? Biblical values, traditional marriage, blah blah blah? She seems to have left “topless photos” off her list of “traditional values.” Via JoeMyGod, who offers this appropriate quote from 1 Timothy 2:9: “I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair [extensions] or gold [highlights] or pearl [necklaces] or expensive [lingerie] clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.”
And, yes, I’m generally pro toplessness. But if “biblical values” are the standard by which Carrie Prejean wants to judge others—and limit their rights—then she should be judged by the same standard and called out if she fails to adhere to those same biblical/traditional values. And if it turns out she’s just another bible-thumping hypocrite—just another Christian bigot who obsesses over what the bible has to say about me while conveniently ignoring what the bible has to say about her—then she deserves to be outed.
UPDATE: Please, please, please don’t let this be a hoax.
LC, there’s nothing a gay marriage opponent can do wrong, is there? You hypocrite.
Here’s the issue: If you’re going to use the Bible to justify ANYTHING, then you better be living in line with the Bible 100%.
THAT is the issue.
@45.
‘Days of yore’?
Seriously?
49, Perhaps you should have read on to the last paragraph before the update?
How many of these “models” claimed to follow the Bible, and wanted to deny others rights based on their selective cherry picking scripture interpretation?
@ 49, Dan is NOT holding himself up to Biblical standards. Therefore he does NOT have to meet them.
Miss California IS holding gays up to Biblical standards. Therefore she HAS to meet them too.
God, homophobes are fucking morons.
55
Dan is quoting the Bible and calling out Miss Cali.
@55
Dan IS holding Miss California up to Biblical standards. Therefore he HAS to meet them too.
God, homos are fucking morons.
56, Really? Do you really not get the point? It’s pretty obvious. That it’s spelled out and still zooming over your head says more about you, and your poor reading comprehension than Dan.
As long as we’re cherry picking scriptures, this is one of my very, very favorites!
Here’s the truth for all you guys here who seem not to know anything about women (figures), I’ve seen far racier pictures in lingerie catalogs. The warped view that some of you have of people of faith (specially women) surprises me because you seem to think that we have to be bland on all covered up like the women of the Taliban LOL. Here’s another FYI, people of faith have just as much fun as any of you, we are young, love live and can balance it with having kids and work. We just do it in a healthy way.
You can cry foul all you want and all you’ll accomplish with it is
1 Look like the aggressors and wanting to harm this woman
2 Equating gay rights with Perez Hilton
3 Coming out as women haters
Perhaps that’s what you really want.
I love this Prejean woman. She’s forcing all us civil rights proponents to finally stoop down to the level we need to to win this thing.
I mean, this has to be a ploy. She can’t be so dumb tto not see that everything she’s doing is working vastly in the opposite way she wants it to.
She has Dan namedropping Perez Hilton. She’s a ringer.
56 & 57, it’s called holding a mirror up.
Dumbass.
LC, have all the fun you want; just know that you’re not living by Biblical standards when you do.
Um, 61, have you ever read the Bible? It specifically says not to do all of the things you just listed. Oh, yeah, only gay people have to follow the Bible. You get pick and choose, and ignore what you don’t want to follow. (Maybe that’s why your demographic brings up over 80% of their children out of wedlock, and in broken homes?)
@57 — No he’s not:
He’s not holding her up, he’s saying that if she’s going to hold OTHERS up to those standards then she should be held to those same standards. You know: Let [s]he who is without sin cast the first stone? I bet if she slithered back to the silicone-enhanced rock she crawled from, Dan wouldn’t waste another thought on her. I know I wouldn’t.
First to the hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is the act of being less critical of oneself than of others. That means that if Miss California says “biblical values” are the standard by which she wants to judge others, she should follow them. Dan points out that he is pro-toplessness, so he’s not enforcing any set of beliefs on anyone, just enforcing the set of beliefs that she has claimed to put upon herself on her, which isn’t hypocritical.
@ 44 First of all, do you know how many things Leviticus says you shall be executed for? A married couple having sex during a woman’s period, both should be executed. If one is a medium or spiritualist, stone them. Oh, and you can be executed for cursing ones parents. Leviticus forbids so many things, many of them food rules – such as following kosher, which somewhere back in the day Christians decided they didn’t have to follow, so how did that one sentence of Leviticus become fair game?
But, beside that. Basically everything in Leviticus was written for one of two reasons: health or to differentiate Jews from Gentiles. Two men engaging in sex meant to be like the Gentiles. It was seen as a religious crime of idolatry, not a sexual offense, and that was why it was serious enough to merit death.
@63
And Dan is the one holding the mirror up.
Dickwad.
@63
And Dan is the one holding the mirror up.
Dickwad.
@ 68, That’s right. He can do that and not be a hypocrite.
Did Loveschild’s handle get scooped up by a pretender? She’s not usually such a equivocator.
Loveschild: As our resident Krazy Kristian, when does it go from “fun” to “a sin”? I mean, I’m all for boobies and have no moral issue with seeing them and enjoying them in the context of consensual adult norms, but the KKs tend to have a more restrictive view on boobies and wave the magic book of stories around saying it proves that ladies should keep their boobies reserved for their husbands. Could you please explain at what point the magic book kicks in and for who?
@66
Yes- he is:
“then she should be judged by the same standard and called out if she fails to adhere to those same biblical/traditional values.”
Dan is judging her by Biblical standards.
He’s IS holding her up, and if he’s going to hold Miss Cali up to those standards then HE should be held to those same standards.
@ 72, you don’t get it. Let’s just say that you’re really, really wrong, which is typical of someone driven to illogical conclusions by emotion, and leave it at that.
72, Let me see if I can dumb it down enough for you to understand.
Miss Prejean claims to live by the Bible, and says that others should too.
Dan doesn’t claim to live by the Bible.
Now the next part seems to be where you get lost. Dan is saying that if one claims to live by the Bible, (Dan doesn’t claim to live by the Bible) and wants to force others by law to live by the Bible, (as Miss Prejiz does) then that person should actually live by the Bible.
@ 74, don’t you get it? Dan is AUTOMATICALLY signed up to live by the Bible when he turns it against Miss CA.
I see the light, o worthless troll! Hallelulia!
Apparently, she didn’t read her entire Ms. Cali pagent contract or she had some reading comprehension issues. Contestants are not permited to pose for any nude photos, partial or full. I wonder if they regret helping her obtain her, to boost her self confidence, breast enhancement?
@72: No, he’s not. Perhaps you are being purposefully obtuse, perhaps you are just stupid, but this is what is called an “if…then” statement. If X happens then Y should happen.
Like this one: IF he said “She has posed for racy photos and should be stoned”, THEN he would be holding her up to biblical standards. He is merely pointing out the fact that she is cherry picking morality and ridiculing her for it. No bible necessary.
77
Cherry picking.
Like quoting Timothy to condemn Miss Cali but ignoring Leviticus?
Dan is the one quoting the Bible.
I know, we’ll make it an “if…then” statement:
IF Dan is going to quote 1 Timothy 2:9 to condemn Miss California for dressing immodestly
THEN he should be willing to adhere to Leviticus 20:13 which calls for homosexuals to be killed.”
Is that how it works?
@9
I wonder if Miss California ever claimed to be perfect.
Or a perfect Christian.
I wonder if “Christians” would be inclined to extend forgiveness.
Or is that a favor only extended to “Christians” who support homosexuality?
@78: Dan referenced JoeMyGod, who offered the quote. He didn’t say he believed it, nor supported it. Sorry. Go troll there, maybe you’ll have better luck.
78, 79, Do you really not get the irony that don’t follow the Bible, yet that isn’t stopping you from quoting it.
80
Dan already linked JoeMyGod which had the verse.
But that wasn’t enough for an indignant Bible-Thumping Sin Condemning Dan…
He also quoted 1Timothy 2:9 in full in his post and commented on it.
Admit it.
Dan is going all Anita Bryant on us.
82, again you are quoting the Bible, (Thumping, as you put it) yet you don’t follow it.
83
I am a bad bad man.
This is the answer she gave that night:
“I think it’s great Americans are able to choose one or the other,” she said. “We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what in my country, in my family I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody there, but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be, between a man and a woman.” The issue then was about marriage and her answer was not advocating to hate another person… as for the photo, if she has returned to the God of the Bible (repents) she is forgiven and so will anyone else.
@ 85, that depends on whether she’s sorry for posing for the pictures or for having them made public. Knowing these opportunistic people, it’s probably the latter.
84, I wouldn’t say you are bad, just not too quick on the uptake.
Ugh. I wouldn’t fuck her with Pat Robertson’s dick.
http://playboyplaymatescenterfold.blogsp…
@ 89 has no new pix but a lot of annoying ads and popups.
@88 cont
Because I couldn’t bear to have it out of my mouth for the time it would take….
It seems some commentators missed the point of Dan Savage’s post. He quotes the Bible as an “if… then” (as pseudonym Bible study is so much fun! used) to refer to Miss California’s use of the Bible to relate to her character. I think it’s superfluous to post that sentence here, especially since Dan Savage’s piece is two paragraphs long, so try reading it again (second paragraph) so you understand what Mr. Savage was trying to say.
It would also seem that some people here have a really poor understanding of the Bible. Specifically the nature of the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. In that story the tradition of hospitality was violated by the citizens of those communities. A man had envited the messenger of God into his house and the rest of the community came to violate him, but the man offered up his daughters instead. this is a story of hospitality. When we are inhospitable to even the messenger of God surely we are deserving of his wrath. To parallel it to another teaching, think of the story of the good Samaritan who helped a robbed and beaten man despite the fact that he was of a people conisidered enemies of the Samaritans. So don’t bring that shit up like it condemns Gays, you miss represent both Jews and Christians who have a God of love and inclusion. As for Carrie Prejean, she is a leotard. Maybe they should get her and Octo-pussy to do a film together, because thats their only hope for a financial future based upon their past merits. If they pass on that, then they should begin to fill out those Wal-Mart greeter applications.
I don’t get the appeal of the skeletal form, myself, or the appeal of those rock-hard lumps of Barbie plastic on the front of the skeleton. But each to their own.
I think it’s cute when people respond to the anonymous posts. It’s like giving a quarter to a leper in Calcutta.
95
A quarter to a leper.
You’re a big man, Sven.
A big big man.
A Big Brimming Boy.
A Bulky Copious Commodius Creature.
An Enormously Full Filled Fellow.
A Massively Mammoth Mound of Mankind.
A Ponderous Packed Pile of Person.
A Jumbo Gelatinous Gigantic Guy.
A Hefty Hulking Humongous Heavyweight Heap of Husky Humanity.
A Big Fat Waddling Slobbering Tub of Jiggly Goo Sorry-Assed Excuse for a man.
86, we really don’t know, cause that’s ultimately between her and God… if her relationship with the Creator is genuine then mercy is promised, and the price of her transgressions will have been paid for by Yeshua (Jesus) at the cross. As this scripture states, Daniel 12:2,
“Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt.” It is about the Way that we are to have a relationship with God, the Truth it reveals, and the Life that it will provide. God bless!
What is funny is how all of you fucking ass-to-mouth cocksuckers in these posts hate anyone else who has a different opinion then you, then you call everyone else hypocritic haters. Well, hey, if you like sucking shit-stained cock go for it because soon you will die and the rest of us won’t have to smell your breath anymore.
@98:
Funny, your mom did exactly that last night – she couldn’t get enough of sucking my shit-stained cock!
99
perhaps you could impose upon her to teach you how to wipe your ass without smearing shit all over yourself.