To get the most value out of Jonathan Mostowโs Surrogates, I very much recommend first watching Alex Riveraโs Sleep Dealer. A sleep dealer is an actual person; a surrogate is a robot. A sleep dealer is a Mexican who ensouls a robot and becomes a worker in the U.S.; a surrogate is a consumer ensouled by a U.S. citizen. Put both films together, and we get a future world of robot workers and consumer robots.
Also, both films are about revolutions: Sleep Dealer climaxes with a worker revolution; Surrogates climaxes with a consumer revolution. The first revolution moves from bottom to top: A worker (Luis Fernando Peรฑa) rebels against the privatization of the commonโwater, memories, love, familial feelings, cultural heritage, and so on. In short, the sleep dealer wants human rights. The second revolution moves from top to bottom: A prominent consumer (Bruce Willis) rebels against a world that has no immediacy, that is totally artificialโhe longs for a return to real bodies, real sex, real caresses. In short, the consumer wants to be a human.
The revolution in Sleep Dealer, a low-budget art-house film with unknown actors, is about going forward, going to a place in the future (a world that has globalized human rights). Surrogates, a big-budget Hollywood film with famous actors, is about going back in time, going to a prelapsarian condition. Indeed, a consumer revolution turns out to be its complete opposite: a devolution. The rebellion in Sleep Dealer is Marxist in the deepest senseโthe exploited worker appropriates the means of exploitation (the means of production) and uses them against the exploiter (corporate America). The rebellion in Surrogates is, in essence, reactionaryโa man who is deeply disgusted with the hedonism of robotized consumer culture challenges the system.
Sadly, the most interesting elements of Surrogates are not explored, precisely because they are dangerous and have actual revolutionary power. For example, the robots in the real world (shopping, dancing, doing drugs) do not always match (racially or sexually) the masters that operate them from futuristic easy chairsโthe masters are always at home, always in pajamas. A white man can have a black surrogate or a female surrogate. This space between what is real and what is artificial (or what is possible) creates room for play, disorder, and invention. The film hints at this troubling area only twice, and each time only for a few seconds, and then quickly returns to the predicable plot. If Surrogates had fully entered those dark in-between spaces, then it would have been what it is not: an extraordinary work of science fiction. ![]()

an intersing analysis, and worthy of review by script writers. I, too, watched Sleep Dealer first and saw a strong similarity (I googled the two and got your blog). I, Robot also comes to mind.
Each has fundamental flaws (Sleep Dealer is not a solution to migration issues e.g. US retailers need the circulation of money by low-income migrants, living locally).
Surrogates starts with an obvious flaw: that surrogates have somehow led to lower crime rates. Wouldn’t many take the opportunity to use their surrogates for dangerous activities? And how do the marginalized afford them? (“98% use surrogates”). Crime is too deeply embedded to be removed by a single technology. Instead, I would expect a strong black market in surrogates, identities, etc. The virtual army was logical, but what about civilian corps? Flashmobs would take on a new meaning!
Lastly, why are the operators still able to walk? While living live vicariously, they can hardly stay in shape!