Comments

1
Do it, Nick! Do it! You will have support from across the country if you do.
2
I like it! I definitely go for kicking Tim Burgess out of the council.
3
Nick needs to pack it it. He's a creature of the 90s and doesn't have the acumen to be effective against the status quo of socially liberal Libertarians and socially conservative Neo Liberals. Nick has lost touch, because he hasn't adapted and can't.
4
Clark and Burgess are splitting some votes. Burgess picks up numbers and everybody else loses ground.



But, Nick will say positive and negative things about running at large, then do the most politically expedient thing at the very last minute.
5
I will vote for a mop with a bucket on its head to get ride of Sally Clark. Run, Nick, run.
6
Nick and O"Brien will flip a coin to see who retires.
7
It would be a shame if the district plan ended up causing the loss of one our more progressive council members. Hopefully Licata or O'Brien will run for one of the at large seats and we can get rid of one of the bland functionaries instead.
8
O'Brien is a Neoliberal. He is not a progressive. Learn the difference.
9
Yes - as an independent candidate taking no corporate donations!
10
Nick for City Council president.
11
See, and I was thinking that O'Brien not having McGinn to collude with and the district result giving O'Brien the lowest "favorable" rating was a better indication that it's time for him to either change his policies or bow out. You came to a very different conclusion I see.
http://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-profi…
12
"Ballard/Fremont District 6" - District 6 also contains Greenwood/Phinney and Greenlake.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.